As filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on April 14, 2025.

Registration No. 333-   

 

UNITED STATES

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Washington, D.C. 20549

 

 

FORM S-1

REGISTRATION STATEMENT

UNDER

THE SECURITIES ACT OF 1933

 

 

American Integrity Insurance Group, LLC

to be converted as described herein to a corporation named

American Integrity Insurance Group, Inc.

(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)

 

 

 

Delaware		6331		20-5178266
(State or other jurisdiction of incorporation or organization)		(Primary Standard Industrial Classification Code Number)		(IRS Employer Identification No.)

 

5426 Bay Center Drive, Suite 600

Tampa, FL 33609

(813) 880-7000

(Address, including zip code, and telephone number, including area code, of registrant’s principal executive offices)

 

 

Robert Ritchie

Chief Executive Officer

5426 Bay Center Drive, Suite 600

Tampa, FL 33609

(813) 880-7000

(Name, address, including zip code, and telephone number, including area code, of agent for service)

 

 

Copies to:

 

Matthew L. Fry Logan J. Weissler Haynes and Boone, LLP 2801 N. Harwood Street, Suite 2300 Dallas, Texas 75201 (214) 651-5000		Dwight S. Yoo Ryan J. Dzierniejko Michael P. Reed Skadden, Arps, Slate, Meagher & Flom LLP One Manhattan West New York, New York 10001 (212) 735-3000

 

 

Approximate date of commencement of proposed sale to the public: As soon as practicable after the effective date of this Registration Statement.

If any of the securities being registered on this Form are to be offered on a delayed or continuous basis pursuant to Rule 415 under the Securities Act of 1933 check the following box: ☐

If this Form is filed to register additional securities for an offering pursuant to Rule 462(b) under the Securities Act, please check the following box and list the Securities Act registration statement number of the earlier effective registration statement for the same offering. ☐

If this Form is a post-effective amendment filed pursuant to Rule 462(c) under the Securities Act, check the following box and list the Securities Act registration statement number of the earlier effective registration statement for the same offering. ☐

If this Form is a post-effective amendment filed pursuant to Rule 462(d) under the Securities Act, check the following box and list the Securities Act registration statement number of the earlier effective registration statement for the same offering. ☐

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, smaller reporting company, or an emerging growth company. See the definitions of “large accelerated filer”, “accelerated filer,” “smaller reporting company,” and “emerging growth company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act.

 

Large accelerated filer		☐		Accelerated filer		☐
Non-accelerated filer		☒		Smaller reporting company		☐
				Emerging growth company		☒

If an emerging growth company, indicate by check mark if the registrant has elected not to use the extended transition period for complying with any new or revised financial accounting standards provided pursuant to Section 7(a)(2)(B) of the Securities Act. ☐

 

 

The registrant hereby amends this Registration Statement on such date or dates as may be necessary to delay its effective date until the registrant shall file a further amendment which specifically states that this Registration Statement shall thereafter become effective in accordance with Section 8(a) of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, or until this Registration Statement shall become effective on such date as the Securities and Exchange Commission, acting pursuant to said Section 8(a), may determine.

 

EXPLANATORY NOTE

Immediately before the effectiveness of this registration statement, American Integrity Insurance Group, LLC intends to convert into a Delaware corporation pursuant to a statutory conversion and change its name to American Integrity Insurance Group, Inc. as described in the section “Corporate Conversion” of the accompanying prospectus. In the accompanying prospectus, we refer to all of the transactions related to our conversion to a corporation as the Corporate Conversion. Unless the context otherwise requires, all references in the accompanying prospectus to the “Company,” “American Integrity,” “we,” “us,” “our” or similar terms refer to American Integrity Insurance Group, LLC and its consolidated subsidiaries before the Corporate Conversion, and American Integrity Insurance Group, Inc. and, where appropriate, its subsidiaries after the Corporate Conversion. Except as disclosed in the prospectus, the consolidated financial statements and selected historical consolidated financial data and other financial information included in this registration statement are those of American Integrity Insurance Group, LLC and its subsidiaries and do not give effect to the Corporate Conversion. Shares of Common Stock of American Integrity Insurance Group, Inc. are being offered by the accompanying prospectus.

 

A Letter from Robert Ritchie, Founder and Chief Executive Officer

The Power of Trust, Resilience, and Vision

Dear Prospective Investors,

When I founded American Integrity in 2006, it wasn’t just about creating a business—it was about fulfilling a mission. In the aftermath of the devastating 2004 and 2005 hurricane seasons, Floridians faced uncertainty as national insurers pulled back. Families were left vulnerable, and the need for a stable, reliable partner became clear.

Starting American Integrity during such a turbulent time might have seemed like an uphill battle, but we were determined to establish an insurance company that would be there for Floridians when they needed it most. We were looking to the future and had strong conviction around the opportunity this turbulence created. We saw where the market needed to go: disciplined underwriting, innovative risk management, and an unwavering commitment to customer service. This vision has guided us every step of the way.

Who We Are

Headquartered in Tampa, Florida, we are a dynamic and thriving insurance group dedicated to safeguarding homes and communities across the Sunshine State. Through our subsidiary, American Integrity Insurance Company of Florida, Inc., we specialize in providing personalized residential property insurance solutions for single-family homeowners and condominium owners.

We have been a stable and disciplined provider of residential insurance coverage in Florida for more than 19 years. Our management team founded our company in 2006 to capitalize on the dislocation in Florida’s residential property insurance market caused by the devastating 2004 and 2005 hurricane seasons. At a time when national insurers were retreating, we stepped forward, building a strong foundation to support homeowners in their time of need.

Today, we are proud to be recognized as the seventh largest writer of residential property insurance in Florida, as measured by direct premiums written as of December 31, 2024, based on data from the FLOIR. Beyond Florida, we have thoughtfully expanded our footprint to include Georgia and South Carolina, reinforcing our commitment to growth and excellence in the southeastern United States.

Building Strength Through Resilience

From the very beginning, our focus was on addressing Florida’s unique challenges. The result is a company that not only provides financial stability but also serves as a lifeline for families during their most challenging moments. At the heart of our operations lies a steadfast commitment to protecting the homes and dreams of our policyholders. Whether it’s crafting tailored insurance solutions or offering peace of mind in the face of natural disasters, we are proud to stand as a leading specialist residential property insurer in Florida, shaping the future of our industry with resilience, integrity, and unwavering dedication.

Our Guiding Principles

At American Integrity, our six corporate values form the foundation of everything we do:

 

•

Integrity: We earn trust by consistently doing the right thing. Integrity is our moral compass, guiding us through every decision, big or small.

 

•

Commitment: We stand by our policyholders, agents, and employees with unwavering dedication, especially during life’s most challenging moments.

 

•

Teamwork: Collaboration is at the heart of our success. We achieve our goals together, leveraging diverse perspectives and shared expertise to find innovative solutions.

 

•

Humility: We approach every challenge with an open mind, listening, learning, and continuously improving.

•

Passion: We are passionate about protecting the homes and dreams of our policyholders. This fuels our drive to innovate and excel in every aspect of our business.

 

•

Fun: We believe in creating an environment where people thrive, finding joy in their work while making a positive impact on others.

These values not only guide our operations but also shape the culture that makes American Integrity a great place to work and a trusted partner in the industry.

Looking to the Future

The challenges of our industry are significant, from climate change to evolving regulations and economic pressures. Yet, we remain steadfast in our mission to adapt and thrive. With a foundation of trust, a culture of innovation, and a team of dedicated professionals who embody our six corporate values, we’re uniquely positioned to meet the needs of our policyholders today and for generations to come.

Our vision is one of continuous growth and adaptability. With plans for further expansion, investments in technology, and continued focus on employee well-being, we’re building a company that will stand the test of time.

None of this would be possible without the incredible team at American Integrity, the support of our partners, and the trust of our policyholders. Together, we are building more than a company—we’re creating a legacy of protection, resilience, and peace of mind.

Thank you for taking the opportunity to learn about our vision and for your consideration of joining us on this journey. The future is bright, and we couldn’t be more excited to share it with you.

Sincerely,

 

Robert Ritchie

Founder and Chief Executive Officer

American Integrity Insurance Group

TABLE OF CONTENTS

 

PROSPECTUS SUMMARY			1
RISK FACTORS			23
CAUTIONARY NOTE REGARDING FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS			50
CORPORATE CONVERSION			51
DIVIDEND POLICY			52
USE OF PROCEEDS			53
CAPITALIZATION			54
DILUTION			56
MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS			58
INDUSTRY			80
BUSINESS			87
MANAGEMENT			119
EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION			124
CERTAIN RELATIONSHIPS AND RELATED PARTY TRANSACTIONS			133
SECURITY OWNERSHIP OF CERTAIN BENEFICIAL OWNERS, MANAGEMENT AND SELLING STOCKHOLDERS			135
DESCRIPTION OF CAPITAL STOCK			137
CERTAIN CONSIDERATIONS FOR ERISA AND OTHER U.S. BENEFIT PLANS			143
SHARES ELIGIBLE FOR FUTURE SALE			145
U.S. FEDERAL INCOME TAX CONSIDERATIONS FOR NON-U.S. HOLDERS			147
UNDERWRITING			151
LEGAL MATTERS			161
EXPERTS			161
CHANGE IN INDEPENDENT AUDITOR			161
WHERE YOU CAN FIND MORE INFORMATION			163
INDEX TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND SCHEDULES			F-1

Neither we, the Selling Stockholders nor the underwriters have authorized anyone to provide any information or to make any representations other than those contained in this prospectus or in any free writing prospectuses we and the underwriters have prepared. We, the Selling Stockholders and the underwriters take no responsibility for, and can provide no assurance as to the reliability of, any other information that others may give you. We, the Selling Stockholders and the underwriters are offering to sell shares of Common Stock and seeking offers to buy shares of Common Stock only in jurisdictions where such offers and sales are permitted. The information in this prospectus is accurate only as of the date of this prospectus, regardless of the time of delivery of this prospectus or any sale of the Common Stock. Our business, financial condition, results of operations and prospects may have changed since that date.

For investors outside of the United States: Neither we, the Selling Stockholders nor any of the underwriters have done anything that would permit this offering or possession or distribution of this prospectus or any free writing prospectus we may provide to you in connection with this offering in any jurisdiction where action for that purpose is required, other than in the United States. Persons outside of the United States who come into possession of this prospectus and any free writing prospectus must inform themselves about and observe any restrictions relating to this offering and the distribution of this prospectus outside of the United States.

Through and including     , 2025 (the 25th day after the date of this prospectus), all dealers effecting transactions in these securities, whether or not participating in this offering, may be required to deliver a prospectus. This requirement is in addition to a dealer’s obligation to deliver a prospectus when acting as an underwriter and with respect to an unsold allotment or subscription.

 

i

COMMONLY USED DEFINED TERMS

As used in this prospectus, unless the context indicates or otherwise requires, the terms listed below have the following meanings:

 

•

“we,” “us,” “our,” the “Company,” “AII,” “American Integrity” and similar references refer: (i) following the consummation of the Corporate Conversion and this offering, to American Integrity Insurance Group, Inc., and, unless otherwise stated, all of its direct and indirect subsidiaries, and (ii) prior to the completion of the Corporate Conversion and this offering, to AIIG LLC.

 

•

“AICS” means American Integrity Claims Services, LLC, a Texas limited liability company.

 

•

“AIICFL” means American Integrity Insurance Company of Florida, Inc., a Florida corporation.

 

•

“AIIG LLC” means American Integrity Insurance Group, LLC, a Texas limited liability company.

 

•

“AIMGA” means American Integrity MGA, LLC, a Texas limited liability company.

 

•

“Citizens” means Citizens Property Insurance Corporation of Florida, a Florida corporation. Citizens was created by the Florida legislature in 2002 as a not-for-profit, tax-exempt, government entity to provide property insurance to eligible Florida property owners unable to find insurance coverage through the private market.

 

•

“Corporate Conversion” refers to all of the transactions related to AIIG LLC’s conversion from a Texas limited liability company to a Delaware corporation, which will happen prior to the effectiveness of the registration statement of which this prospectus forms a part. As a part of such conversion, AIIG LLC may first convert to a Delaware limited liability company before converting to a Delaware corporation.

 

•

“Existing Owners” refers collectively to the owners of units of AIIG LLC prior to the consummation of the Corporate Conversion.

 

•

“FLOIR” means the Florida Office of Insurance Regulation.

 

•

“NCQSR” refers to Non-Catastrophe Quota Share Reinsurance, our pre-existing quota share arrangements with third-party reinsurers to provide capital relief for certain losses as described in.

 

•

“NYSE” refers to the New York Stock Exchange.

 

•

“PIF” refers to policies in-force, which represents the number of active insurance policies with coverage in effect as of the end of the period referenced.

 

•

“Restricted Stock Grant” means those grants of      shares of restricted stock to certain employees and consultants of the Company in connection with this offering.

 

•

“Restricted Stock Grant Net Settlement” means the net issuance of      shares of Common Stock in connection with the Restricted Stock Grants made upon the consummation of this offering after giving effect to the withholding of      shares of Common Stock to satisfy the estimated tax withholding and remittance obligations (as further described herein).

 

•

“Take-out” refers to a depopulation from Citizens where we selectively assume policies from Citizens as described in “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations—Key Factors Affecting Our Results of Operations and Comparability Between Periods—Citizens “Take-out” Program.”

 

•

“Voluntary Market” refers to the insurance market in which the Company underwrites and sells policies to policyholders it may freely choose or reject without the assistance of residual market mechanisms.

 

ii

BASIS OF PRESENTATION

American Integrity Insurance Group, LLC, the registrant whose name appears on the cover of the registration statement of which this prospectus forms a part, is a Texas limited liability company. Prior to effectiveness of such registration statement, American Integrity Insurance Group, LLC intends to convert into a Delaware corporation pursuant to a statutory conversion and change its name to American Integrity Insurance Group, Inc. as described in the section titled “Corporate Conversion.” As a result of such conversion, the members of American Integrity Group, LLC will become holders of shares of Common Stock of American Integrity Insurance Group, Inc. Shares of Common Stock of American Integrity Insurance Group, Inc. are being offered by this prospectus. Except as otherwise disclosed, the consolidated financial statements and other financial information included elsewhere in this prospectus do not give effect to the Corporate Conversion. We do not expect that the Corporate Conversion will have a material effect on the results of our operations.

Unless otherwise indicated, information presented in this prospectus assumes (i) that the underwriters’ option to purchase additional Common Stock is not exercised, (ii) that the initial public offering price of the shares of our Common Stock will be $    per share (the midpoint of the price range set forth on the cover page of this prospectus) and (iii) the filing and effectiveness of the certificate of incorporation (our “Charter”) and the bylaws (our “Bylaws”), each of which will be adopted immediately prior to the consummation of this offering. See “Description of Capital Stock” for a description of our Charter and Bylaws.

PRESENTATION OF FINANCIAL INFORMATION

Financial information for AIIG LLC and its subsidiaries prior to the year ended December 31, 2023 is derived from audited financial statements that were audited by our prior auditors, Thomas Howell Ferguson P.A., and not by our independent registered public accounting firm. See “Experts” and “Change in Independent Auditor.” Such information includes the historical net income data prior to 2023, the financial data for periods prior to 2023 on which compound annual growth rates are calculated and similar disclosure.

Certain monetary amounts, percentages, and other figures included in this prospectus have been subject to rounding adjustments. Percentage amounts included in this prospectus have not in all cases been calculated on the basis of such rounded figures, but on the basis of such amounts prior to rounding. For this reason, percentage amounts in this prospectus may vary from those obtained by performing the same calculations using the figures in our consolidated financial statements included elsewhere in this prospectus. Certain other amounts that appear in this prospectus may not sum due to rounding.

 

iii

INDUSTRY AND MARKET DATA

The market data and certain other statistical information used throughout this prospectus are based on independent industry publications, government publications or other published independent sources, and management estimates.

Management estimates are derived from publicly available information released by independent industry analysts and other third-party sources, as well as data from our internal research, and are based on assumptions made by us upon reviewing such data, and our experience in, and knowledge of, such industry and markets, which we believe to be reasonable. The industry in which we operate is subject to a high degree of uncertainty and risk due to a variety of factors, including those described in the section titled “Risk Factors.” These and other factors could cause results to differ materially from those expressed in these publications.

TRADEMARKS AND TRADE NAMES

We own or have rights to various trademarks, service marks and trade names that we use in connection with the operation of our business. This prospectus may also contain trademarks, service marks and trade names of third parties, which are the property of their respective owners. Our use or display of third parties’ trademarks, service marks, trade names or products in this prospectus is not intended to, and does not imply, a relationship with us or an endorsement or sponsorship by or of us. Solely for convenience, the trademarks, service marks and trade names referred to in this prospectus may appear without the ^®, TM or SM symbols, but such references are not intended to indicate, in any way, that we will not assert, to the fullest extent under applicable law, our rights or the right of the applicable licensor to these trademarks, service marks and trade names.

NON-GAAP FINANCIAL MEASURES

This prospectus contains “non-GAAP financial measures” that are financial measures that either exclude or include amounts that are not excluded or included in the most directly comparable measures calculated and presented in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States (“GAAP”). Specifically, we make use of the non-GAAP financial measures (i) underwriting income (loss), (ii) adjusted net income (loss), (iii) adjusted return on equity, (iv) underlying loss and loss adjustments expense ratio and (v) ceded catastrophe excess of loss premiums ratio.

We present the non-GAAP financial measures in this prospectus as supplemental measures of financial performance that are not required by, or presented in accordance with, GAAP.

Our management uses these non-GAAP financial measures, in conjunction with GAAP financial measures, as an integral part of managing our business and to, among other things: (i) monitor and evaluate the performance of our business operations and financial performance; (ii) facilitate internal comparisons of the historical operating performance of our business operations; (iii) facilitate external comparisons of the results of our overall business to the historical operating performance of other companies that may have different capital structures and debt levels and different go-to-market models; (iv) review and assess the operating performance of our management team; (v) analyze and evaluate financial and strategic planning decisions regarding future operating investments; and (vi) plan for and prepare future annual operating budgets and determine appropriate levels of operating investments. The non-GAAP financial measures are not recognized terms under GAAP and should not be considered as alternatives to the corresponding GAAP measures of financial performance, or any other performance measure derived in accordance with GAAP. Because not all companies use identical calculations, the presentation of the non-GAAP financial measures may not be comparable to other similarly titled measures of other companies and can differ significantly from company to company. For a discussion of the use of the non-GAAP financial measures and a reconciliation of the most directly comparable GAAP measures, see “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations — Key Business Metrics and Non-GAAP Financial Measures.”

 

iv

 

1

 

2

 

3

 

4

 

5

 

6

 

7

 

8

 

9

 

10

 

11

 

12

 

13

 

14

 

15

 

16

 

17

 

18

 

19

 

20

 

21

 

22

RISK FACTORS

An investment in our Common Stock involves a variety of risks, some of which are specific to us and some of which are inherent to the industry in which we operate. The following risks and other information in this report or incorporated in this report by reference, including our consolidated financial statements and related notes and “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations,” should be read carefully before investing in our Common Stock. These risks may adversely affect our financial condition, results of operations or liquidity. Many of these risks are out of our direct control, though efforts are made to manage those risks while optimizing financial results. These risks are not the only risks we face. This prospectus is qualified in its entirety by all these risk factors. References in this section to the “Company,” “American Integrity,” “we,” “us,” or “our” refer to American Integrity Insurance Group, Inc. and its subsidiaries.

Risks Related to Our Business

As a property and casualty insurer, we may face significant losses, and exposure to catastrophic events and severe weather conditions may cause our financial results to significantly vary from period to period.

Because of the exposure of our property and casualty business to catastrophic events, our operating results or financial condition have varied, and may in the future vary, significantly from one period to the next, and our historical results of operations may not be indicative of future results of operations. Property damage resulting from catastrophes is the greatest risk of loss we face in the ordinary course of our business. Artificial or natural disasters, including but not limited to hurricanes, convective storms, tornadoes, tropical storms, sinkholes, windstorms, hailstorms and other severe weather events may cause catastrophes. The frequency and severity of property insurance claims typically increase when catastrophic events and severe weather conditions occur. Catastrophes are inherently unpredictable and difficult to project. As a result, we have in the past and may in the future, suffer financial loss due to unpredictable numbers of claims as catastrophes occur.

The loss estimates developed by the models we use are dependent upon assumptions or scenarios incorporated by a third-party developer and by us. When these assumptions or scenarios do not reflect the characteristics of catastrophic events that affect areas covered by our policies or the resulting economic conditions, then we become exposed to losses not covered by our reinsurance program, which could adversely affect our financial condition, business or results of operations. Although we use widely recognized and commercially available models to estimate our exposure to loss from hurricanes and certain other catastrophes, other models exist that might produce a wider or narrower range of loss estimates, or loss estimates from perils considered less significant to our insured risks. These models are constantly changing, and we may utilize different models than we have historically. Despite our catastrophe management programs, we retain material exposure to catastrophic events. Additionally, the models themselves produce a range of results and associated probabilities of occurrence from which we can assess risks of exposure to catastrophic loss. Extreme catastrophe scenarios exist within the modeling results that may also have a material adverse effect on our results of operations during any reporting period due to increases in our losses. Catastrophes may reduce or otherwise impact liquidity, which could have a negative impact on our business. Catastrophes have eroded and in the future may erode our statutory surplus or ability to obtain adequate reinsurance which could negatively affect our ability to write new or renewal business. Catastrophic claim severity is impacted by the effects of inflation and increases in insured value and factors such as the overall claims, legal and litigation environments in affected areas, in addition to the geographic concentration of insured property.

Our loss reserves are estimates and may be inadequate to cover our actual liability for losses, which could adversely affect our business.

We maintain reserves to cover our estimated ultimate liabilities for losses and LAE, also referred to as loss reserves. Our loss reserves are based primarily on our historical data and statistical projections of what we believe the resolution and administration of claims will cost based on facts and circumstances then known to us.

 

23

Our claims experience and our experience with the risks related to certain claims are inherently limited. We use company historical data to the extent it is available and rely on industry historical data, which may not be indicative of future periods. As a result, our projections and our estimates may be inaccurate, which in turn may cause our actual losses to exceed our loss reserves. If our actual losses exceed our loss reserves, our financial results, our ability to expand our business and our ability to compete in the property and casualty insurance industry may be negatively affected.

Because of the inherent uncertainties in the reserving process, we cannot be certain that our reserves will be adequate to cover our actual losses and LAE. If our reserves for unpaid losses and LAE are less than actual losses and LAE, we will be required to increase our reserves with a corresponding reduction in our net income in the period in which the deficiency is identified. Future losses and LAE that exceed our reserves could substantially harm our results of operations or financial condition.

Because we conduct substantially all of our business in Florida, our financial results depend on the regulatory, legal, economic and weather conditions in Florida.

Though we are licensed to transact insurance business in other states, we write substantially all of our policies in Florida. Because of our concentration in Florida, we are exposed to hurricanes, windstorms and other catastrophes affecting Florida. We have incurred and may in the future incur higher catastrophe losses in Florida or elsewhere than those we experienced in prior years; those estimated by catastrophe models we use; the average expected level used in pricing; and our current reinsurance coverage limits. We are also subject to claims arising from non-catastrophic weather events such as rain, hail and high winds.

Additionally, in Florida, despite the recent decrease in the frequency of claims due in part to recent legislative reforms, the severity of costs associated with both catastrophe claims and non-catastrophe claims has continued to increase. The nature and level of future catastrophes, the incidence and severity of weather conditions in any future period, and the impact of catastrophes on behaviors related to non-catastrophe claims cannot be predicted and could materially and adversely impact our operations.

Therefore, prevailing regulatory, consumer behavior, legal, economic, political, demographic, competitive, weather and other conditions in Florida affect our revenues and profitability. The Florida legislature changes laws related to property insurance frequently and has done so more often in recent years. While some of these law changes have been designed to reduce abuses in the Florida market and reinvigorate admitted market interest in expanding writings, other law changes have imposed new or increased requirements on insurers that might prove to be detrimental to our business. In addition, extended implementation periods, ensuing regulatory rule making timelines and periods of uncertainty as opponents of the changes challenge them in court often follow changes to Florida’s insurance laws. Resulting delays in the effectiveness of new laws, even when intended to be beneficial for the insurance industry, may limit or delay the laws’ impact on our business.

Adverse changes in these conditions in Florida have a more pronounced effect on us than it would on other insurance companies that are more geographically diversified throughout the United States. A single catastrophic event, or a series of such events, specifically affecting Florida, particularly in the more densely populated areas of the state, have had and could have an adverse impact on our business, financial condition or results of operations. This is particularly true in certain Florida counties where we write a large amount of policies such that a catastrophic event or series of catastrophic events in these counties could have a significant impact on our business, financial condition or results of operations. Our concentration in Florida subjects us to increased exposure to certain catastrophic events and destructive weather patterns such as hurricanes, tropical storms and tornadoes and to the ensuing claims-related behaviors that have characterized the Florida market in recent years.

While we operate substantially all of our business in Florida, we have expanded our business into other geographical markets, and there is no guarantee that such expansion will be successful or that the underwriting and profitability criteria we utilize in Florida will successfully translate to other states. In addition, we are and

 

24

will continue to be subject to regulatory, legal, economic and weather conditions in the states where we will write policies, which are often different than the conditions we face in Florida. As a result, we may not be able to adjust to changing conditions in other states in which we write policies due to our focus and expertise in Florida, and as a result, our results of operations may be materially affected.

Changing climate conditions may increase the severity and frequency of catastrophic events and severe weather conditions, which may adversely affect our business.

Longer-term weather trends may be changing, and new types of catastrophe losses may be developing due to climate change, a phenomenon that has been associated with greenhouse gases and extreme weather events linked to rising temperatures, including effects on global weather patterns, sea, land and air temperature, sea levels, rain, and snow. To the extent the frequency or severity of weather events is exacerbated due to climate change, we may experience increases in catastrophe losses in both coastal and non-coastal areas. This may increase our claims-related and/or insurance costs or may negatively affect our ability to provide insurance to our policyholders. In addition, increased catastrophic events could result in increased credit exposure to the reinsurers that we work with. Our actual losses from catastrophic events might exceed levels that the third parties’ reinsurance programs protect or might be larger than anticipated if one or more of our reinsurers fail to meet their obligations. Climate change may affect the occurrence of certain natural events, such as increasing the frequency or severity of convection storms, wind, tornado, hailstorm and thunderstorm events due to increased convection in the atmosphere. There could also be more frequent wildfires in certain geographies, more flooding and the potential for increased severity of hurricanes due to higher sea surface temperatures. As a result, incurred losses from such events and the demand, price and availability of reinsurance coverages for homeowners insurance may be affected. This may cause an increase in claims-related and/or reinsurance costs or may negatively affect our ability to provide homeowners insurance to our policyholders in the future.

In addition, we cannot predict how legal, regulatory and societal responses to concerns around climate change may impact our business. The inherent uncertainties associated with studying, understanding and modeling changing climate conditions, available analyses and models in this area typically relate to potential meteorological or sea level impacts and generally are not intended to analyze or predict impacts on insured losses.

Actual claims incurred have exceeded, and in the future may exceed, reserves established for claims, adversely affecting our operating results and financial condition.

We maintain loss reserves to cover our estimated ultimate liability for unpaid losses and LAE for reported and unreported claims as of the end of each accounting period. The reserve for losses and LAE is reported net of receivables for subrogation. Recorded claim reserves in the property and casualty business are based on our best estimates of what the ultimate settlement and administration of claims will cost, both reported and incurred but not reported. These estimates, which generally involve actuarial projections, are based on management’s assessment of known facts and circumstances, including our experience with similar cases, actual claims paid, historical trends involving claim payment patterns, pending levels of unpaid claims and contractual terms. External factors are also considered, which include but are not limited to changes in the law, court decisions, changes to regulatory requirements, economic conditions including inflation as experienced in recent years, and consumer behavior (including as a result of any foreign or domestic tariffs, taxes or levies instituted in connection with ongoing global trade negotations). Many of these factors are not quantifiable and are subject to change over time. The current Florida homeowners’ insurance market is adversely impacted by changes in claimant behaviors resulting in losses and LAE exceeding historical trends, amounts experienced in other states, and amounts we previously estimated. The increases in losses and LAE are attributable to the active solicitation of claims activity by policyholder representatives, high levels of represented claims compared to historical patterns or patterns seen in other states, and a proliferation of inflated claims filed by policyholder representatives and vendors.

 

25

Additionally, there sometimes is a significant reporting lag between the occurrence of an event and the time it is reported to us. The inherent uncertainties of estimating reserves are greater for certain types of liabilities, particularly those in which the various considerations affecting the type of claim are subject to change and in which long periods of time elapse before a definitive determination of liability is made. We continually refine reserve estimates as experience develops and as subsequent claims are reported and settled. Adjustments to reserves are reflected in the financial statement results of the periods in which such estimates are changed. Inflationary pressures, rising energy prices, supply chain issues and other macroeconomic conditions (including as a result of any foreign or domestic tariffs, taxes or levies instituted in connection with ongoing global trade negotations) have caused increases in the cost of building materials and labor, which in turn have caused the cost to replace damaged or destroyed property to increase. We model expected costs (including expected inflation) associated with any policy we write in order to help determine the amount of premiums needed for the policy to yield our targeted profit. Inflation and other macroeconomic factors have increased our costs more than we anticipated and may continue to do so in the future. Because our policies generally carry a term of one year, replacement costs have, at times in the past, exceeded our estimates (including as a result of inflation), causing our targeted profit to be eroded or eliminated. This has resulted in our paid losses exceeding prior reserve estimates and in increases in our current estimates of unpaid losses and LAE. Because setting reserves is inherently uncertain and claims conditions change over time, the ultimate cost of losses has varied and, in the future, may vary materially from recorded reserves, and such variance may continue to adversely affect our operating results and financial condition. The full extent of the ongoing disruptions and claims behaviors in the Florida market, and the extent to which legislative efforts aimed at mitigating these concerns will be successful, is unknown and still unfolding.

Subrogation is a significant component of our total net reserves for losses and LAE. There has been a significant increase in our efforts to pursue subrogation against third parties responsible for property damage losses to our policyholders. More recently, changes in Florida’s claims environment and legal climate have reduced the effectiveness of our efforts to properly apportion losses through subrogation. Responsible parties are increasingly using delays and defensive tactics to avoid subrogation and increase its costs, which in turn decreases its effectiveness. Our ability to recover recorded amounts remains subject to significant uncertainty, including risks inherent in litigation, collectability of the recorded amounts and potential law changes or judicial decisions that can hinder or reduce the effectiveness of subrogation.

Lack of effectiveness of exclusions and other loss limitation methods in the insurance policies we assume or write could have a material adverse effect on our financial condition or results of operations.

Provisions of our policies, such as limitations or exclusions from coverage, which are designed to limit our risks, may not be enforceable in the manner we intend. In addition, the policies we issue contain conditions requiring the prompt reporting of claims to us and our right to decline coverage in the event of a violation of that condition. While our insurance product exclusions and limitations reduce the loss exposure to us and help eliminate known exposures to certain risks, it is possible that a court or regulatory authority could nullify or void an exclusion or limitation, or legislation could be enacted that modifies or bars the use of such endorsements and limitations in a way that would adversely affect our loss experience, which could have a material adverse effect on our financial condition or results of operations.

Because we rely on third-party distribution partners, including independent insurance agents, homebuilder- affiliated agents and national insurance carriers who restrict the amount of business they write in Florida, the loss of these relationships and the business they control or our inability to attract distribution partners could have an adverse impact on our business.

Our business depends in part on the marketing efforts of third-party distribution partners, including independent insurance agents, homebuilder-affiliated agents and national insurance carriers who restrict the amount of business they write in Florida and our ability to offer products and services that meet the requirements of our third-party distribution partners and their customers’ requirements. We write insurance policies in the Voluntary

 

26

Market through various channels, including through a network of independent agents, which represents our largest distribution channel, as measured by GPW for the year ended December 31, 2024. Many of our competitors also distribute through these same partners as these agents have the ability to write or re-write business with other carriers. As a result, we must compete with other insurers for our partners’ business. Our competitors may offer a greater variety of insurance products, lower premiums for insurance coverage or higher commissions to their third-party distribution partners. If our products, pricing and commissions do not remain competitive, we may find it more difficult to attract business from our partners to sell our products. We cannot provide assurance that we will retain our current distribution relationships, or be able to establish new distribution relationships, with independent agents. We also rely on other third parties such as third-party claims adjusters as part of our claims management process and utilize third-party reinsurers to help cover losses. The inability to maintain these relationships with these third-party providers could have a material impact on our business and results of operations.

Although we believe that recent legislative reforms have driven a stabilization of rates, our results may fluctuate based on cyclical changes in the insurance industry.

The insurance industry historically has been cyclical, characterized by periods of intense price competition due to excessive underwriting capacity and periods of shortages of capacity that permitted an increase in pricing and, thus, more favorable underwriting profits. As premium levels increase, there may be new entrants to the market, which could lead to a decrease in policies written. Any of these factors could lead to a reduction in revenue in future periods, less favorable policy terms and fewer opportunities to underwrite insurance risks, which could have a material adverse effect on our results of operations and cash flows. In addition to these considerations, changes in the frequency and severity of losses suffered by policyholders and insurers may affect the cycles of the insurance business significantly.

We believe the legislative reforms in 2022 have driven a stabilization of rates within the insurance industry, however, we cannot predict whether market conditions will continue to improve, remain constant or deteriorate, and the characterization of the insurance market as a whole is subject to varying interpretations and opinions that fluctuate regularly. Negative market conditions may impair our ability to write insurance at rates that we consider appropriate relative to the risk assumed. If we cannot write insurance at appropriate rates, our business could be materially and adversely affected.

We may pursue opportunities to participate in Citizens’ take-out program and directly assume policies issued by Citizens to policyholders who were otherwise unable to obtain private insurance. Take-out opportunities are subject to a number of timing and execution risks, and we may fail to participate in Citizens’ take-out programs on terms that are ultimately profitable to us, or at all.

Citizens acts as Florida’s state-owned insurer of last resort, and is the largest homeowners insurer in Florida as measured by premiums in-force. From time to time, Citizens will transfer certain of its existing policies to private companies in order to reduce the State of Florida’s risk exposure. We participated in four take-out opportunities in 2024 assuming 68,844 policies. As of December 31, 2024, 21% of our policies in-force were assumed from Citizens representing 24% of our premiums in-force. Prior to 2024, we had not pursued a take-out opportunity since 2014 and therefore have less recent experience in executing on these opportunities than certain of our peers. Although each policy we pursue from Citizens is run through our standard underwriting procedures, the amount of data made available to us by Citizens may be less or different from what is available to us in the Voluntary Market. The lack of availability of this information may pose a material risk to our underwriting profitability with respect to any take-outs we pursue.

Additionally, there can be no guarantee that Citizens will timely offer sizeable take-out opportunities to the private insurance market that would meet our underwriting and profitability criteria or continue the depopulation program at all. While Citizens does replenish its policies after conducting take-outs, there is no guarantee that such replenishments will meet our underwriting and profitability criteria or provide attractive take-out

 

27

opportunities for us in the future, and our financial condition may suffer as a result. In addition, there may be a negative perception regarding our depopulations from Citizens or the desirability of the policies we assume, which could adversely affect the price of our Common Stock.

Further, the market for attractive take-out opportunities is highly competitive and is subject to a bidding process. If competing private insurers offer a lower premium than us for the same policy, Citizens is required to allocate that policy to the insurer who offers the lowest premium. In the past, certain of our peers have been able to offer lower premiums than us when pursuing the same take-out opportunities. Other carriers may also choose to re-enter or expand their business in Florida in light of potential attractive take-out opportunities and generally improving market conditions on the back of the legislative reforms in 2022. Additionally, following the term of each policy assumed from Citizens, the policyholder has the opportunity to renew their policy similar to our underwriting process in the Voluntary Market. There is no guarantee that we will be able to renew these assumed policies, and a lack of renewals could harm our financial condition.

Reinsurance coverage may not be available to us in the future at commercially reasonable rates, or at all.

Reinsurance is a method of transferring part of an insurance company’s liability under an insurance policy to another insurance company, or reinsurer. We use reinsurance arrangements to limit and manage the amount of risk we retain, to stabilize our underwriting results and to increase our underwriting capacity. The cost of such reinsurance is subject to prevailing market conditions beyond our control, such as the amount of capital in the reinsurance market and the occurrence of natural and human-made catastrophes. We cannot be assured that reinsurance will remain continuously available to us in sufficient amounts or at prices acceptable to us. As a result, we may determine to increase the amount of risk we retain or look for other alternatives to reinsurance, which could in turn have a material adverse effect on our financial position, results of operations and cash flows.

Reinsurance subjects us to the credit risk of our reinsurers who may suffer a downgrade, and we risk not being able to collect reinsurance amounts in a timely manner, or at all, due to us under our contracts with reinsurers, which could materially harm our business and financial condition.

Reinsurance does not legally discharge us from our primary liability for the full amount of the risk we insure, although it may make the reinsurer liable to us in the event of a claim. In addition, our reinsurers may not pay claims we incur on a timely basis, or they may not pay some or all of these claims. Our inability to collect a material recovery from a reinsurer or to collect such recovery in a timely fashion could have a material adverse effect on our operating results, financial condition and liquidity.

In addition, we are subject to credit risk with respect to our reinsurers as third-party rating agencies assess and rate the claims-paying ability of reinsurers based upon criteria established by the rating agencies. We address this credit risk by selecting reinsurers that have an A.M. Best Financial Strength Rating of “A-” (Excellent) or better at the time we enter into the agreement or for which we hold collateral equal to 100% of the reinsurance recoverable. Downgrades to the credit ratings of our reinsurance counterparties may result in the reduction of rating agency capital credit provided by those reinsurance contracts, which could limit our ability to write new policies or renew existing policies. If one or more of our reinsurers were to suffer a credit downgrade, our financial condition may suffer, and we may be forced to consider various options to lessen the risk of asset impairment, including commutation, novation and letters of credit. The collectability of reinsurance recoverables is subject to uncertainty arising from many factors, including our reinsurers’ (i) financial capacity, (ii) willingness to make payments under the terms of a reinsurance treaty or contract and (iii) whether insured losses meet the qualifying conditions and are recoverable under our reinsurance contracts for covered events or are excluded.

 

28

The failure of the risk mitigation strategies we utilize could have a material adverse effect on our financial condition or results of operations.

We utilize a number of strategies to mitigate our risk exposure including:

 

•

employing proper underwriting processes;

 

•

carefully evaluating the terms and conditions of our policies;

 

•

selective underwriting with respect to certain geographic areas we consider high-risk due to the potential of catastrophe events or litigation; and

 

•

ceding insurance risk to reinsurance companies.

However, there are inherent limitations in these strategies. We are unable to assure that an event or series of events will not result in loss levels that could have a material adverse effect on our financial condition or results of operations.

The inherent uncertainty of models and our reliance on such models as a tool to evaluate risk may have an adverse effect on our financial results.

We use models developed by third-party vendors in assessing our exposure to catastrophe losses, and these models assume various conditions and probability scenarios, most of which are not known to us or are not within our control. These models may not accurately predict future losses or accurately measure losses incurred. In addition, these models are constantly changing, and we may utilize different models than we have historically. Competing models may differ in assessing risk and often utilize different underlying assumptions. The accuracy of models in estimating insured losses from prior storms has varied considerably by catastrophe when compared to actual results from those catastrophes. If these models understate the exposures we assume, we may not properly assess the risk and we may make poor decisions relating to pricing, underwriting and selecting the related amount of reinsurance we purchase. This uncertainty may materially impact our financial results.

Our success depends on our ability to accurately price the risks we underwrite, which is subject to uncertainty.

The results of our operations and our financial condition depend on our ability to underwrite and accurately set premium rates for a variety of risks. Rate adequacy is necessary to generate sufficient premiums to pay losses, LAE, underwriting expenses and to earn a profit. To price our products accurately, we must collect and properly analyze a substantial amount of data; develop, test and apply appropriate rating formulas; closely monitor and timely recognize changes in trends; and project both severity and frequency of losses with reasonable accuracy. Our ability to undertake these efforts successfully, and thus, price our products accurately, is subject to several risks and uncertainties, some of which are outside of our control, including:

 

•

the availability of sufficient reliable data;

 

•

the uncertainties that inherently characterize estimates and assumptions;

 

•

our selection and application of appropriate rating and pricing techniques;

 

•

changes in legal standards, claim settlement practices, and restoration costs; and

 

•

legislatively imposed consumer initiatives.

In addition, we could underprice risks, which could negatively affect our financial results. We could also overprice risks, which could reduce our retention, sales volume and competitiveness. The foregoing factors could materially and adversely affect our business and results of operations.

Our information technology systems may fail or be disrupted, which could adversely affect our business.

Our insurance business is highly dependent upon the successful and uninterrupted functioning of our computer and data processing systems. We rely on these systems to perform underwriting and other modeling functions

 

29

necessary for writing policies and handling our policy administration process. The failure or disruption of these systems could interrupt our operations and result in a material adverse effect on our business. The increasing prevalence and severity of cyber-related threats and incidents may further increase the risk of disruption of our information technology systems. The increasing prevalence and severity of cyber-related threats and incidents may further increase the risk of disruption of our information technology systems.

The growth of our insurance business is dependent upon the successful development and implementation of advanced computer and data processing systems as well as the development and deployment of new information technologies to streamline our operations, including policy underwriting, production, administration and claim processing. The failure of these systems to function as planned could adversely affect our future business volume or results of operations. Additionally, our computer and data processing systems could become obsolete or could cease to provide a competitive advantage in policy underwriting, production, administration and claim processing which could negatively affect our results of operations.

If we are unable to expand our business because our capital must be used to pay greater than anticipated claims, our financial results may suffer, and we may require additional capital in the future, which may not be available or may be available only on unfavorable terms.

Our future growth and future capital requirements will depend on the number of insurance policies we write, the kinds of insurance products we offer and the geographic markets in which we do business versus the business risks we choose to assume. Growth initiatives require capital. Our existing sources of funds include potential sales of Common Stock, incurring debt and our earnings from operations and investments. Unexpected catastrophic events in our coverage areas, such as hurricanes, may result in greater claims losses than anticipated, which could require us to limit or halt our growth while we redeploy our capital to pay these unanticipated claims unless we are able to raise additional capital.

To the extent that our present capital is insufficient to meet future operating requirements or to cover losses, we may need to raise additional funds through financing or curtail our growth. Based on our current operating plan, we believe that our current capital together with our anticipated retained income will support our operations. However, we cannot provide any assurance that our current capital will support our current operating plan or future growth, since many factors will affect the amount and timing of our capital needs, including profitability of our business, the availability and cost of reinsurance, market disruptions and other unforeseeable developments. If we require additional capital, it is possible that equity or debt financing may not be available on acceptable terms or at all. In the case of equity financings, dilution to our stockholders could result, and in any case such securities may have rights, preferences and privileges that are senior to those of existing stockholders. If we cannot obtain adequate capital on favorable terms or at all, our business, financial condition or results of operations could be materially adversely affected.

Unanticipated increases in the severity or frequency of claims could adversely affect our business or financial condition.

Changes in the severity or frequency of claims affect our profitability. Although we aim to provide adequate and appropriate coverage under each of our policies, policyholders could purchase policies that prove to be inadequate or inappropriate. If such policyholders bring a claim or claims alleging that we failed in our responsibilities to provide them with the type or amount of coverage that they sought to purchase, we could be found liable for amounts significantly in excess of the policy limit, resulting in an adverse effect on our business, results of operations or financial condition.

Changes in homeowners’ claim severity can be and have been driven by inflation in the construction industry, in building materials and in home furnishings, as well as by other economic and environmental factors, including increased demand for services and supplies in areas affected by catastrophes, supply chain disruptions, labor shortages, and prevailing attitudes towards insurers and the claims process, including increases in the number of

 

30

litigated claims or claims involving representation as well as continuing efforts by policyholder representatives to seek larger settlements on pre-reform claims in recognition that the elimination of the statutory right to attorneys’ fees and other law changes will apply to future claims. However, changes in the level of the severity of claims are not limited to the effects of inflation and demand surge in these various sectors of the economy or to Florida’s disproportionately high incidence of represented claims. Increases in claim severity can also arise from unexpected events that are inherently difficult to predict. In addition, significant long-term increases in claim frequency also have an adverse effect on our operating results or financial condition. Further, the level of claim frequency we experience varies from period to period, and from region to region. Claim frequency can be influenced by natural conditions such as the number and types of severe weather events affecting areas where we write policies as well as by factors such as the prevalence of solicited and represented claims, including efforts by policyholder representatives to encourage claims activity related to policy periods predating law changes. Although we pursue various loss management initiatives in order to mitigate future increases in claim severity and frequency, there can be no assurances that these initiatives will successfully identify or reduce the effect of future increases in claim severity and frequency.

If actual renewals of our existing policies do not meet expectations, our future premiums and results of operations could be materially adversely affected.

We generally write our insurance policies for a one-year term and we make assumptions about the renewal of our prior year’s contracts, including for purposes of determining the amount of reinsurance we purchase. If actual renewals do not meet expectations or if we choose not to write on a renewal basis because of pricing conditions, our premiums written in future years and our future operations could be materially adversely affected, and we have in the past and may in the future purchase reinsurance beyond what we believe is the most appropriate level.

The failure of our claims department, or the third-party claims adjusters whom we may engage, to effectively manage or remediate claims could adversely affect our business, financial results or capital requirements.

We rely on our claims department and outsourced third-party claims adjusters and resources to facilitate and oversee the claims adjustment process for our policyholders. Many factors could affect the ability of our claims department to effectively manage claims by our policyholders, including:

 

•

the accuracy of our adjusters or third-party claims adjusters as they make their assessments and submit their estimates of damages;

 

•

the training, background and experience of our claims representatives and third-party claims adjusters;

 

•

the ability of our claims department and third-party claims adjusters to ensure consistent claims handling;

 

•

the ability of our claims department to translate the information provided by third-party adjusters into acceptable claims resolutions; and

 

•

the ability of our claims department and third-party adjusters to maintain and update their claims handling procedures and systems as they evolve over time based on claims and geographical trends in claims reporting.

Any failure to effectively manage the claims adjustment process (including failure to manage our third-party adjusters), including failure to pay claims accurately, could lead to litigation, undermine our reputation in the marketplace, impair our corporate image and negatively affect our financial results.

Increased competition and market conditions, including changes in our financial stability and credit ratings, could affect the growth of our business and negatively affect our financial results.

The Florida residential insurance marketplace is currently dominated by single state or regional insurance companies, with the larger national insurance carriers maintaining an overall smaller market share. Our lines of

 

31

insurance are written by both these smaller insurers and the large national carriers, in addition to other markets such as Citizens, which are highly competitive. Many of these large national insurance companies have greater name recognition, established insurance agency networks and stronger financial resources to compete should they decide to recommit to Florida and begin writing new policies. Some of the regional or single state carriers could merge to form a company larger than ours and be in a position to compete against us in a larger fashion by paying higher commissions or other tactics. New insurance companies are being formed in Florida and will bring more competition into the market. In addition, insurance agents are knowledgeable about insurance company strength, and some have a bias towards placing policyholders with better rated companies. We have a financial stability rating of A, “Exceptional” from Demotech, an independent financial firm specializing in evaluating the financial stability of regional and specialty insurers, and whose rating is accepted by major mortgage companies. Large National carriers may have a rating from a more recognized rating firm named A.M. Best, which we do not have. We could receive a downgrade from Demotech, which could result in the loss of business and an adverse impact on our results and operations. Additionally, a credit rating downgrade could also result in a significant reduction in the number of policies that we may be able to sell to our policyholders who may be sensitive to fluctuations in such ratings.

In addition, industry developments could further increase competition in our industry. These developments could include:

 

•

an influx of new capital in the marketplace as existing companies attempt to expand their businesses and new companies attempt to enter the insurance business as a result of better premium pricing and/or policy terms;

 

•

an increase in programs in which state-sponsored entities provide property insurance in catastrophe- prone areas;

 

•

changes in state regulatory climates; and

 

•

the passage of federal proposals for an optional federal charter that would allow some competing insurers to operate under regulations different or less stringent than those applicable to us.

These developments and others could make the property and casualty insurance marketplace more competitive by increasing the supply of insurance available. If competition limits our ability to write new business at adequate rates, our future results of operations could be adversely affected.

We rely on qualified and highly-skilled personnel and if we are unable to attract, retain or motivate key personnel, our business may be seriously harmed.

Our performance depends on the talents and efforts of highly-skilled and experienced individuals. Our operations are dependent on the efforts of our senior executive officers. The loss of their leadership, industry knowledge and experience could negatively impact our operations. However, we have management succession plans to lessen any such negative impact. Our future success depends on our continuing ability to identify, hire, develop, motivate and retain highly skilled and experienced personnel and, if we are unable to hire and train a sufficient number of qualified employees for any reason, we may not be able to maintain or implement our current initiatives or grow, or our business may contract and we may lose market share. Our competitors or other insurance or technology businesses may seek to hire our employees. We cannot assure that we will provide adequate incentives to attract, retain and motivate employees in the future. If we do not succeed in attracting, retaining and motivating highly qualified personnel, our business may be seriously harmed.

Our business could be materially adversely affected by geopolitical conditions, pandemics and macroeconomic conditions.

Geopolitical conditions such as changes in domestic or foreign policy, wars, conflicts, including those in Ukraine and in the Middle East, and other global events have and may bring increased uncertainty. In addition, rising

 

32

inflation, high interest rates, supply chain issues, labor shortages, volatility in capital markets and other economic risk have and may continue to increase economic uncertainty. Inflation and interest rates directly impact the buying and selling of residences, which impacts our insurance policies as well as the rates we may offer on our insurance policies. Any one or combination of these conditions may materially impact our business, results of operations or financial condition.

Pandemics and other outbreaks of disease have had and can have significant and wide-spread impacts. As seen with the COVID-19 pandemic, outbreaks of disease can cause governments, public institutions and other organizations to impose or recommend, and businesses and individuals to implement, restrictions on various activities or take other actions to combat the disease’s spread, such as warnings, restrictions and bans on travel, transportation or in-person gatherings; and local or regional closures or lockdowns. Outbreaks of disease, and actions taken in response to the outbreak, could materially negatively impact our workforce, business, operations and financial results, both directly and indirectly.

If we fail to comply with our obligations under license or technology agreements with third parties, or if we cannot license rights to use technology or data on reasonable terms, we could be required to pay damages, lose license rights that are critical to our business or be unable to commercialize new products and services in the future.

We license from third parties certain intellectual property, technology and data that are important to our business and, in the future, we may enter into additional agreements that provide us with licenses to valuable intellectual property, technology or data. If we fail to comply with any of our obligations under our license or technology agreements with third parties, we may be required to pay damages and the licensor may have the right to terminate the license. Termination by the licensor (or other applicable counterparty) may cause us to lose valuable rights, and could disrupt our operations and harm our reputation. Our business may suffer if any current or future licenses or other grants of rights to us terminate, if the licensors (or other applicable counterparties) fail to abide by the terms of the license or other applicable agreement, if the licensors fail to enforce the licensed intellectual property against infringing third parties or if the licensed intellectual property rights are found to be invalid or unenforceable.

In the future, we may identify additional third-party intellectual property, technology and data we need, including to develop and offer new products and services. However, such licenses may not be available on acceptable terms or at all. Further, third parties from whom we currently license intellectual property, technology and data could refuse to renew our agreements upon their expiration or could impose additional terms and fees that we otherwise would not deem acceptable requiring us to obtain the intellectual property or technology from another third party, if any is available, or to pay increased licensing fees or be subject to additional restrictions on our use of such third-party intellectual property or technology. Defense of any lawsuit or failure to obtain any of these licenses on favorable terms could prevent us from commercializing products or services, which could have a material adverse effect on our competitive position, business, financial condition and results of operations.

Cybersecurity attacks or other breaches of our systems could have an adverse impact on our business and reputation.

Our business and operations rely on the secure and efficient processing, storage and transmission of customer and company data, including policyholders’ nonpublic personal information, financial information and proprietary business information, on our computer systems and networks. Unauthorized access to personally identifiable information, even if not financial information, could damage all affected parties. Breaches can involve attacks intended to obtain unauthorized access to nonpublic personal information, destroy data, disrupt or degrade service, sabotage systems or cause other damage, including through the introduction of computer viruses or malware, cyberattacks and other means. Breaches can also involve human error, such as employees falling victim to phishing schemes or computer coding errors that may leave data exposed.

 

33

Our computer systems may be vulnerable to unauthorized access and hackers, computer viruses and other scenarios in which our data may be exposed or compromised. Cyberattacks can originate from a variety of sources, including third parties who are affiliated with foreign governments or employees acting negligently or in a manner adverse to our interests. Third parties may seek to gain access to our systems either directly or using equipment or security passwords belonging to employees, policyholders, third-party service providers or other users of our systems. Our systems also may inadvertently expose, through a computer programming error or otherwise, confidential information as well as that of our policyholders and third parties with whom we interact. In addition, any significant data security breach of our independent agents or third-party vendors could harm our business and reputation.

Our computer systems have been, and likely will continue to be, subject to cyber hacking activities, computer viruses, other malicious codes or other computer-related penetrations. This is especially the case with employees who work remotely. We commit significant resources to administrative and technical controls to prevent cyber incidents and protect our information technology, but our preventative actions to reduce the risk of cyber threats may be insufficient to prevent physical and electronic break-ins and other cyberattacks or security breaches, including those due to human vulnerabilities. Any such event could damage our computers or systems; compromise our confidential information as well as that of our policyholders and third parties with whom we interact; significantly impede or interrupt business operations, including denial of service on our website; and could result in violations of applicable privacy and other laws, financial loss to us or to our policyholders, loss of confidence in our security measures, customer dissatisfaction, significant litigation exposure and reputational harm, all of which could have a material adverse effect on us. We expend significant additional resources to modify our protective measures and to investigate and remediate vulnerabilities, exposures, or information security events. Due to the complexity and interconnectedness of our systems, the process of enhancing our protective measures can itself create a risk of systems disruptions and security issues.

The increase in the use of cloud technologies and in consumer preference for online transactions can heighten cybersecurity and other operational risks. Certain aspects of the security of such technologies are unpredictable or beyond our control, and this lack of transparency may inhibit our ability to discover a failure by cloud service providers to safeguard their systems and prevent cyberattacks that could disrupt our operations and result in misappropriation, corruption or loss of confidential and other information. In addition, there is a risk that encryption and other protective measures, despite their sophistication, may be defeated, particularly to the extent that new computing technologies vastly increase the speed and computing power available.

Although we have no plans to do so, we are not restricted from incurring indebtedness and may do so in the future.

Subject to market conditions and availability, we are not restricted from incurring indebtedness and may do so in the future. We are permitted to enter into credit facilities (including term loans and revolving facilities) and to conduct public and private debt issuances. The amount of debt we may incur may vary depending on our available investment opportunities, our available capital and our ability to obtain and access financing arrangements with lenders. Our governing documents contain no limit on the amount of debt we may incur and we may do so at any time without approval of our stockholders.

Incurring debt could subject us to many risks that, if realized, would materially and adversely affect us, including the risk that: our cash flow from operations may be insufficient to make required payments of principal of and interest on the debt or we may fail to comply with covenants contained in our debt instruments;

 

•

debt may increase our vulnerability to adverse economic, market and industry conditions with no assurance that our investment yields will increase to match our higher financing costs;

 

•

we may be required to dedicate a substantial portion of our cash flow from operations to payments on our debt, thereby reducing funds available for operations, future business opportunities, distributions to our stockholders or other purposes; and

 

•

we may not be able to refinance maturing debts.

 

34

We have identified material weaknesses in our internal control over financial reporting. If we are unable to develop and maintain an effective system of internal control over financial reporting, we may not be able to accurately report our financial results in a timely manner, which may adversely affect investor confidence in us and materially and adversely affect our business and operating results, and we may face litigation as a result.

A material weakness is a deficiency, or a combination of deficiencies, in internal control over financial reporting such that there is a reasonable possibility that a material misstatement of annual or interim financial statements will not be prevented, or detected and corrected, on a timely basis. In connection with the preparation of the Company’s financial statements as of and for the year ended December 31, 2024, management and our independent auditors identified material weaknesses in our internal control over financial reporting. The material weakness related to the following:

 

•

Control Documentation – Management identified a material weakness in the Company’s overall control environment due to the aggregate effect of multiple deficiencies in internal controls, which affected the control activities component of the Company’s internal control framework, including with respect to controls that address claims payments in the Company’s policy administrative system, reconciliation of claim payments used by the Company’s actuaries to estimate reserves, reconciliation of premium receivable balances and reserve for credit losses, reconciliation of investments held by consolidated variable interest entities, and the reconciliation of ceding commission. The Company did not maintain sufficiently detailed and precise documentation in support of the design and operation of controls, which is pervasive throughout the Company’s internal control environment.

Effective internal controls are necessary to provide reliable financial reports and prevent fraud. Material weaknesses could limit the ability to prevent or detect a misstatement of accounts or disclosures that could result in a material misstatement of annual or interim financial statements.

The Company’s management continues to evaluate steps to remediate the material weaknesses. We are in the early stages of designing and implementing a plan to remediate the material weaknesses identified. Our current plan includes the below:

 

•

Hiring additional experienced accounting, financial reporting and internal control personnel and changing roles and responsibilities of our personnel as we transition to being a public company and are required to comply with Section 404 of the Sarbanes Oxley Act of 2002.

 

•

Implement company-wide internal control training to deepen our employees’ understanding of their role in relation to our overall control environment and establish clear expectations for control documentation.

 

•

Engage external service providers to assist management as we enhance written policies and procedures to establish specific actions expected of control owners, such that sufficient documentation is maintained to demonstrate control activities are performed consistently throughout the organization and with an appropriate level of precision to meet objectives and mitigate risks to acceptable levels.

 

•

Review and enhance the design of controls to evaluate accounting policies and establish processes and controls to review management’s estimate of credit losses due to the cancellation of insurance policies.

We cannot assure you that these measures will remediate the material weaknesses described above. The implementation of these remediation measures is in the early stages and will require validation and testing of the design and operating effectiveness of our internal controls over a sustained period of financial reporting cycles and, as a result, the timing of when we will be able to remediate the material weaknesses is uncertain and we may not remediate these material weaknesses during the years ended December 31, 2024 and 2025. If the steps we take do not remediate the material weaknesses in a timely manner, there could be a reasonable possibility that these control deficiencies or others may result in a material misstatement of our annual or interim financial statements that would not be prevented or detected on a timely basis. This, in turn, could jeopardize our ability to comply with our reporting obligations, limit our ability to access the capital markets and adversely impact our stock price.

 

35

Changes in accounting practices and future pronouncements may materially affect our reported financial results.

Developments in accounting practices may require us to incur considerable additional expenses to comply, particularly if we are required to prepare information relating to prior periods for comparative purposes or to apply the new requirements retroactively. The impact of changes in current accounting practices and future pronouncements cannot be predicted but may affect the calculation of net income, stockholder’s equity and other relevant financial statement line items.

AIICFL is required to comply with statutory accounting principles, or SAP. SAP and various components of SAP are subject to constant review by the National Association of Insurance Commissioners (“NAIC”) and its task forces and committees, as well as state insurance departments, in an effort to address emerging issues and otherwise improve financial reporting. Various proposals are pending before committees and task forces of the NAIC, some of which, if enacted and adopted on a state level, could have negative effects on insurance industry participants. The NAIC continuously examines existing laws and regulations. We cannot predict whether or in what form such reforms will be enacted and, if so, whether the enacted reforms will positively or negatively affect us.

Risks Related to Our Regulatory Environment

We are subject to extensive regulation, and potential further restrictive regulation may increase our operating costs and limit our growth and profitability.

Laws and regulations applicable to the insurance industry are complicated and subject to change. Compliance with these laws and regulations may increase the costs of running our business or slow our ability to respond effectively and quickly to operational opportunities. Insurance regulators change, are appointed by elected officials who are subject to re-election and changes in political headwinds and preferences, and the FLOIR could change its interpretation of one or more existing regulations to the detriment of the Company and its business. In addition, state legislatures enact new statutes, and can change existing statutes, which could have a material impact on our costs, operations and profitability. In addition, the Company is admitted in states outside of Florida, and legislatures or insurance regulators in those states might have differing interpretations or take positions that conflict with Florida regulators, which could impact our growth, expansion and profitability. The federal government may also seek to further regulate the insurance industry or establish federal charters. As a highly regulated entity, insurance regulators have the final say on major issues affecting our business including:

 

•

what rates we may charge;

 

•

what our policy forms must cover or exclude;

 

•

claims practices and business operations;

 

•

how much reinsurance we must purchase;

 

•

participation in guaranty funds;

 

•

various financial tests including ratios of how much premium we may write in relation to our net worth;

 

•

risk based capital measurements;

 

•

restrictions on insurance company dividends;

 

•

restrictive accounting requirements;

 

•

regular financial and market conduct examinations;

 

•

restrictions on investments;

 

•

and many other requirements.

 

36

The FLOIR and regulators in other jurisdictions where we may become licensed and offer insurance products conduct periodic examinations of the affairs of insurance companies and require the filing of annual and other reports relating to financial condition, holding company issues and other matters. These regulatory requirements may adversely affect or inhibit our ability to achieve some or all of our business objectives. These regulatory authorities also conduct periodic examinations into insurers’ business practices. These reviews may reveal deficiencies in our insurance operations or non-compliance with regulatory requirements.

In certain states including Florida, insurance companies are subject to assessments levied by the states where they conduct their business. While we can recover these assessments from Florida policyholders through policy surcharges, our payment of the assessments and our recoveries may not offset each other in the same reporting period in our consolidated financial statements and may cause a material, adverse effect on our cash flows and results of operations in a particular reporting period.

In addition, regulatory authorities have relatively broad discretion to deny or revoke licenses for various reasons, including the violation of regulations. In some instances, we follow practices based on our interpretations of regulations or practices that we believe may be generally followed by the industry. These practices may turn out to be different from the interpretations of regulatory authorities. If we do not have the requisite licenses and approvals or do not comply with applicable regulatory requirements, insurance regulatory authorities could preclude or temporarily suspend us from carrying on some or all of our activities or otherwise penalize us. This could adversely affect our ability to operate our business.

Finally, changes in the level of regulation of the insurance industry or changes in laws or regulations themselves or interpretations by regulatory authorities could adversely affect our ability to operate our business, reduce our profitability and limit our growth.

The regulators powers include suspending our ability to write new business, suspending or revoking our licenses, forcing us to change our business plans and strategies, and financial fines and penalties. This substantial regulation could adversely affect our ability to execute portions of our business plans, or, if we were to have our ability to issue new policies restricted or our license revoked, have a material adverse effect on our results of operations, financial results, or ability to continue in the business.

The effects of emerging claim and coverage issues in Florida on our business are uncertain.

Despite declining loss frequencies the severity of losses in the property and casualty insurance industry and multi-peril personal lines business has increased in recent years, often driven by financial and social inflation. Increased litigation in Florida regarding AOB and roof claims is an example of these trends. For example, in recent years, Florida homeowners have been assigning the benefit of their insurance recovery to third parties, which has resulted in increases in the size and number of claims and the amount of litigation, interference in the adjustment of claims, the assertion of bad faith actions and one-way rights to claim attorneys’ fees. One-way fee shifting allows policyholders to recover attorneys’ fees from their insurer when the policyholder prevails in a coverage action. The Florida legislature enacted several reform bills in recent years with the intention to limit AOB and frivolous litigation. Recently, Florida has repealed its one-way fee shifting statute and altered bad faith actions such that mere negligence alone is insufficient to constitute bad faith, and imposed a good faith requirement on policyholders. While the frequency of non-catastrophe claims has recently decreased due in part to these reforms, the severity of such claims has continued to increase. However, there can be no assurance that this new legislation will reduce the future impact of AOB or litigated claims practices nor is there any assurance that future changes to these or other standards or statutes may occur. In addition, there can be no assurance that the Florida legislature will not reverse these reforms or that future legislation will not mitigate or eliminate the effects of these reforms altogether or impose new burdens on us.

Many legal actions and proceedings have been brought on behalf of classes of complainants, which can increase the size of judgments. The propensity of policyholders and third-party claimants to litigate and the willingness of courts to expand causes of loss and the size of awards may render the loss reserves of AIICFL inadequate for

 

37

current and future losses. In addition, as industry practices and social and other environmental conditions change, unexpected and unintended issues related to claims and coverage may emerge. These issues may adversely affect our business by either extending coverage beyond our underwriting intent or by increasing the number or size of claims. In some instances, these changes may not become apparent until sometime after we have issued insurance policies that are affected by the changes. As a result, the full extent of liability under our insurance policies may not be known at the time such policies are issued or renewed, and our financial position or results of operations may be adversely affected.

Mandatory assessments or competition for government entities may create short term liabilities or affect our ability to underwrite more policies.

All states have guaranty funds that can assess us to pay the claims of insolvent insurers. Florida, where a substantial portion of our business resides, also has a Florida Hurricane Catastrophe Fund, which can assess us if it needs funds to provide reinsurance-like coverage to us and all residential insurers, and additionally, we can also be assessed to pay for shortfalls at Citizens, which provides insurance to residential consumers unable to procure insurance from the private market. While we can recoup or pass through these assessments to our policyholders, in many cases we may not be able to recoup them withing the same annual accounting period creating a short term drain on our resources. In addition, Citizens is structured to be an insurer of last resort, but based on varying involvement by the Florida legislature, the Governor of Florida and others, at times can instead compete against us and offer lower rates, causing us to lose market share, or not underwrite as many new policies as we desire.

We face financial exposure to unpredictable weather patterns and catastrophic storms and resulting regulation from the FLOIR.

We write insurance policies covering homeowners, renters, condominium owners, and mobile home policyholders that cover property losses including those caused by hurricanes and other catastrophes. We manage our risk through strict underwriting, spreading our risk across our service area, and through the purchase of reinsurance. The substantial portion of our business is located in Florida, which is particularly susceptible to hurricanes. The FLOIR requires that we manage risk through reinsurance by purchasing up to or exceeding a 1 in 130 year storm, including coverage for multiple hurricane events in one season. Notwithstanding these requirements and our efforts to plan for and manage risk, a particularly strong storm, or a series of multiple storms in one hurricane season could exceed our reinsurance protection and may have a material adverse impact on our results of operations and financial condition.

The Florida Hurricane Catastrophe Fund may not have enough resources to pay us for the coverage we purchased.

The state-run Florida Hurricane Catastrophe Fund (“FHCF”) charges all insurers premiums for coverage to assume part of the risk of their hurricane related losses. In addition, the FHCF may issue pre and post event bonds to raise capital to meet its commitment to us and other insurers. In the event of a significantly large storm, or multiple storms, the FHCF may not have the resources to pay us all of the coverage we purchased from them, including that the capital markets may not be able to support a large bond issuance by the FHCF. Further, Florida law allows the FHCF to not pay the remaining amount they owe insurers if they do not have enough resources to cover such claims.

A regulatory environment that requires approval of rate increases, can mandate rate decreases, and that can dictate underwriting practices and mandate participation in loss sharing arrangements may adversely affect our results of operations and financial condition.

From time to time, political events and positions affect the insurance market, including efforts to suppress rates to a level that may not allow us to reach targeted levels of profitability. For example, if our loss ratio compares favorably to that of the industry, state regulatory authorities may impose rate rollbacks, require us to pay premium refunds to policyholders, or challenge or otherwise delay our efforts to raise rates even if the homeowners industry generally is not experiencing regulatory challenges to rate increases.

 

38

In addition, certain states have enacted laws that require an insurer conducting business in that state to participate in assigned risk plans, reinsurance facilities and joint underwriting associations. Certain states also require insurers to offer coverage to all consumers, often restricting an insurer’s ability to charge the price it might otherwise charge. In these markets, we may be compelled to underwrite significant amounts of business at lower- than-desired rates, possibly leading to an unacceptable return on equity. Our results of operations and financial condition could be adversely affected by any of these factors.

State insurance regulators impose additional reporting requirements regarding enterprise risk on insurance holding company systems, with which we must comply as an insurance holding company.

In the past decade, various state insurance regulators have increased their focus on risks within an insurer’s holding company system that may pose enterprise risk to the insurer. In 2012, the NAIC adopted significant amendments to the Insurance Holding Company Act and related regulations, or the NAIC Amendments. The NAIC Amendments are designed to respond to perceived gaps in the regulation of insurance holding company systems in the United States. One of the major changes is a requirement that an insurance holding company system’s ultimate controlling person submit annually to its lead state insurance regulator an “enterprise risk report” that identifies activities, circumstances or events involving one or more affiliates of an insurer that, if not remedied properly, are likely to have a material adverse effect upon the financial condition or liquidity of the insurer or its insurance holding company system as a whole. Other changes include the requirement that a controlling person submit prior notice to its domiciliary insurance regulator of a divestiture of control, detailed minimum requirements for cost sharing and management agreements between an insurer and its affiliates and expanding of the agreements between an insurer and its affiliates to be filed with its domiciliary insurance regulator, including states (if any) in which the insurer is commercially domiciled. The NAIC Amendments must be adopted by the individual state legislatures and insurance regulators in order to be effective, and many states have already done so.

In 2012, the NAIC also adopted the Risk Management and Own Risk and Solvency Assessment Model Act, or the ORSA Model Act. The ORSA Model Act, as adopted by the various states, requires an insurance holding company system’s Chief Risk Officer to submit annually to its lead state insurance regulator an Own-risk and Solvency Assessment Summary Report (“ORSA”). The ORSA is an internal assessment, tailored to the nature, scale, and complexity of an insurer or insurance group, conducted by that insurer or insurance group, of the material and relevant risks associated with the business plan of an insurer or insurance group and the sufficiency of capital resources to support those risks. Insurers that exceed $500 million in gross written premiums may be subjected to additional reporting and compliance requirements and costs.

There is also risk that insurance holding company systems may become subject to group capital requirements at the holding company level. In December 2020, the NAIC adopted additional amendments to the Insurance Holding Company System Regulatory Act and the Insurance Holding Company System Model Regulation to provide a framework intended to complement the current holding company analytics framework by providing additional information to the lead state regulator for use in assessing group risks and capital adequacy. The amendments to the Model Act and Model Regulation adopt a group capital calculation and liquidity stress test. We cannot predict whether or when these amendments may be adopted by Florida or the impact, if any, that the new regulatory requirements may have on our business, financial condition or results of operation.

In addition, the NAIC promulgated a Model Audit Rule, which places additional compliance duties and costs on insurers that exceed $500 million in DPW. This rule includes the establishment of additional internal controls, disclosing unremediated material weaknesses and analysis of any limitations of internal control. As the Company grows, and exceeds these premium thresholds, additional costs and duties under these statutes and rules must be implemented, which can materially affect our results of operations.

 

39

Regulations limiting rate changes and requiring us to participate in loss sharing or assessments may decrease our profitability.

From time to time, public policy preferences and perceptions affect the insurance market, including insurers’ efforts to effectively maintain rates that allow us to reach targeted levels of rate adequacy and profitability. Despite efforts to address rate needs and other operational issues analytically, facts and history demonstrate that public policymakers, when faced with untoward events and adverse public sentiment, have acted and may in the future act in ways that impede our ability to maintain a satisfactory correlation between rates and risk. This has included, and in the future may include, policymakers’ failures to take steps to address the causes of adverse market conditions. Such acts or failures to act may affect our ability to obtain approval for or implement rate changes that we believe are necessary to attain rate adequacy along with targeted levels of profitability and returns on equity. Additionally, because AIICFL often must obtain regulatory approval prior to changing rates, delays in the filing, review or implementation of rate changes can adversely affect our ability to attain rate adequacy. This is especially the case in hard markets such as the current Florida market, where many insurers are submitting filings for significant rate increases and consequently thereby affecting the FLOIR’s workload and affecting its ability to timely review filings.

Our ability to afford reinsurance required to reduce our catastrophe risk also depends in part on our ability to adjust rates for our costs.

Additionally, we are required to participate in guaranty funds for insolvent insurance companies and other statutory insurance entities. The guaranty funds and other statutory entities periodically levy assessments against all applicable insurance companies doing business in the state and the amounts and timing of those assessments are unpredictable. Although we seek to recoup these assessments from our policyholders, we might not be able to fully do so and at any point in time or for any period, our operating results and financial condition could be adversely affected by any of these factors.

The amount of statutory capital and surplus that AIICFL has and the amount of statutory capital and surplus it must hold vary and are sensitive to a number of factors outside of our control, including market conditions and the regulatory environment and rules.

AIICFL is subject to risk-based capital (“RBC”) standards and other minimum capital and surplus requirements imposed under applicable state laws. The RBC standards, based upon the Risk-Based Capital Model Act adopted by the NAIC, require us to report our results of RBC calculations to the FLOIR and the NAIC. These RBC standards provide for different levels of regulatory attention depending upon the ratio of an insurance company’s total adjusted capital, as calculated in accordance with NAIC guidelines, to its authorized control level RBC. Authorized control level RBC is determined using the NAIC’s RBC formula, which measures the minimum amount of capital that an insurance company needs to support its overall business operations.

An insurance company with total adjusted capital that (i) is at less than 200% of its authorized control level RBC, or (ii) falls below 300% of its RBC requirement and also fails a trend test, is deemed to be at a “company action level,” which would require the insurance company to file a plan that, among other things, contains proposals of corrective actions the company intends to take that are reasonably expected to result in the elimination of the company action level event. Additional action level events occur when the insurer’s total adjusted capital falls below 150%, 100%, and 70% of its authorized control level RBC. The lower the percentage, the more severe the regulatory response, including, in the event of a mandatory control level event (total adjusted capital falls below 70% of the insurer’s authorized control level RBC), placing the insurance company into receivership.

In addition, AIICFL is required to maintain certain minimum capital and surplus and to limit premiums written to specified multiples of capital and surplus. AIICFL could exceed these ratios if their volume increases faster than anticipated or if their surplus declines due to catastrophe or non-catastrophe losses or excessive underwriting and operational expenses.

Any failure by AIICFL to meet the applicable RBC or minimum statutory capital requirements imposed by the laws of Florida (or other states where we currently or may eventually conduct business) could subject them to

 

40

further examination or corrective action imposed by state regulators, including limitations on our writing of additional business, state supervision or receivership, which could have a material adverse impact on our reputation and financial condition. Any such failure also could adversely affect our financial strength and stability ratings.

Any changes in existing RBC requirements, minimum statutory capital requirements, or applicable writings ratios may require us to increase our statutory capital levels, which we may be unable to do, or require us to reduce the amount of premiums we write, which could adversely affect our business and our operating results.

We will incur increased costs and demands upon management as a result of complying with the laws and regulations affecting public companies, which could adversely affect our operating results.

As a public company, we will incur significant legal, accounting and other expenses that we did not incur as a private company, including costs associated with public company reporting and corporate governance requirements. For example, we will be subject to the reporting requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the “Exchange Act”), and will be required to comply with the applicable requirements of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act, as well as rules and regulations subsequently implemented by the SEC and the New York Stock Exchange (“NYSE”), including the establishment and maintenance of effective disclosure controls and procedures and internal control over financial reporting and changes in corporate governance practices.

We expect that complying with these rules and regulations will substantially increase our legal and financial compliance costs and make some activities more time-consuming and costly. In addition, our management team will have to adapt to the requirements of being a public company. In particular, we expect to incur significant expenses and devote substantial management effort toward ensuring compliance with the requirements of Section 404 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act, which will increase to the extent we are no longer an emerging growth company, as defined by the JOBS Act, and are not a smaller reporting company. We cannot predict or estimate the amount of additional costs we may incur as a result of becoming a public company or the timing of such costs, which could adversely affect our operating results.

The increased costs associated with operating as a public company may decrease our net income or result in a net loss and may require us to reduce costs in other areas of our business or increase the prices of our solution. Additionally, if these requirements divert management’s attention from other business concerns, they could have an adverse effect on our business, operating results or financial condition.

As a public company, we also expect that it may be more difficult or more expensive for us to obtain director and officer liability insurance, and we may be required to accept reduced policy limits and coverage or incur substantially higher costs to obtain the same or similar coverage. As a result, it may be more difficult for us to attract and retain qualified individuals to serve on our board of directors or as our executive officers.

We have elected to rely on certain phase-in provisions of the SEC and/or NYSE rules, and, as a result, we will not immediately be subject to certain corporate governance requirements otherwise required of NYSE-listed companies.

We have applied to list our Common Stock on the NYSE. We will rely on the phase-in rules of the SEC and/or the NYSE with respect to the independence of our compensation and audit committees and the requirement to have a majority of independent directors on our board of directors. These rules permit us to have an audit committee that has one member that is independent by the date that our Common Stock first trades on the NYSE, a majority of members that are independent within 90 days of the effectiveness of the registration statement of which this prospectus forms a part and all members that are independent within one year of the effective date. Similarly, the rules permit us to have compensation committees that have one member that is independent by the date that our Common Stock first trades on the NYSE, a majority of members that are independent within 90 days of the listing date and all members that are independent within one year of the listing date. Additionally, we have 12 months from the date of listing to satisfy the requirement that a majority of the board of directors be

 

41

independent. During the phase-in periods, our stockholders will not have the same protections afforded to stockholders of companies that comply with the NYSE’s independence requirements without reliance on the phase-in periods.

Risks Related to Our Investments

We are subject to market risk, which may adversely affect investment income.

Our primary market risk exposures are changes in interest rates, which impact our investment income and returns. Fluctuations in interest rates could expose us to increased financial risk. Since September 2024, the U.S. Federal Reserve has reduced the target range for the federal funds rate by an aggregate of 100 basis points. Declines in market interest rates can have an adverse effect on our investment income to the extent that we invest cash in new interest-bearing investments that yield less than our portfolio’s average rate of return or purchase longer-term or riskier assets in order to obtain adequate investment yields resulting in a duration gap when compared to the duration of liabilities. Conversely, increases in market interest rates also have in the past and can have an adverse effect on the value of our investment portfolio by decreasing the fair values of the available-for-sale debt securities that comprise a large portion of our investment. In addition, inflation, such as what we are seeing in the current economic environment, has adversely impacted our business and financial results and could in the future.

Our overall financial performance depends in part on the returns on our investment portfolio.

The performance of our investment portfolio is independent of the revenue and income generated from our insurance operations, and there is typically no direct correlation between the financial results of these two activities. Thus, to the extent that our investment portfolio does not perform well due to the factors discussed above or otherwise, our results of operations may be materially adversely affected even if our insurance operations perform favorably. Further, because the returns on our investment portfolio are subject to market volatility, our overall results of operations could likewise be volatile from period to period even if we do not experience significant financial variances in our insurance operations.

We have assets held at financial institutions that may exceed the insurance coverage offered by the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (“FDIC”), the loss of which could negatively impact our financial condition.

As a part of our cash management strategy, we maintain deposits in a U.S. financial institution in an amount intended to satisfy our immediate liquidity needs. Any amounts in excess of $100,000 are swept on a daily basis into a money market fund custodied outside of the financial institution and invested in short-term obligations issued or guaranteed by the U.S. government. Although balances we hold at the financial institution fluctuate daily based on a variety of factors, any exposure over the FDIC limit of $250,000 is limited to short intraday windows. However, in the event of a failure of the financial institution, there is a chance we may be unable to access such funds and may incur a loss to the extent such balance exceeds the FDIC insurance limit during the day prior to a sweep, which could have a negative impact on our liquidity and financial condition.

Risks Related to Our Common Stock and this Offering

Our stock price may change significantly following this offering, and you may not be able to resell shares of our Common Stock at or above the price you paid or at all, and you could lose all or part of your investment as a result.

The initial public offering price for the shares was determined by negotiations between us and the underwriters. You may not be able to resell your shares at or above the initial public offering price due to a number of factors included herein, including the following:

 

•

results of operations that vary from the expectations of securities analysts and investors;

 

42

•

results of operations that vary from those of our competitors;

 

•

changes in expectations as to our future financial performance, including financial estimates and investment recommendations by securities analysts and investors;

 

•

changes in economic conditions for companies in our industry;

 

•

changes in market valuations of, or earnings and other announcements by, companies in our industry;

 

•

declines in the market prices of stocks generally, particularly those of insurance companies;

 

•

strategic actions by us or our competitors;

 

•

changes in general economic or market conditions or trends in our industry or the economy as a whole and, in particular, in the insurance environment;

 

•

changes in business or regulatory conditions;

 

•

future sales of our Common Stock or other securities;

 

•

investor perceptions of the investment opportunity associated with our Common Stock relative to other investment alternatives;

 

•

the public’s response to press releases or other public announcements by us or third parties, including our filings with the SEC;

 

•

announcements relating to litigation or governmental investigations;

 

•

guidance, if any, that we provide to the public, any changes in this guidance, or our failure to meet this guidance;

 

•

the development and sustainability of an active trading market for our stock;

 

•

changes in accounting principles; and

 

•

other events or factors, including those resulting from system failures and disruptions, natural or

 

•

man-made disasters, extreme weather events, war, acts of terrorism, an outbreak of highly infectious or contagious diseases or responses to these events.

Furthermore, the stock market may experience extreme volatility that, in some cases, may be unrelated or disproportionate to the operating performance of particular companies. These broad market and industry fluctuations may adversely affect the market price of our Common Stock, regardless of our actual operating performance. In addition, price volatility may be greater if the public float and trading volume of our Common Stock is low.

In the past, following periods of market volatility, stockholders have instituted securities class action litigation. If we were involved in securities litigation, it could have a substantial cost and divert resources and the attention of management from our business regardless of the outcome of such litigation.

As a result of becoming a public company, we will be obligated to develop and maintain proper and effective internal control over financial reporting in order to comply with Section 404 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act. We may not complete our analysis of our internal control over financial reporting in a timely manner, or these internal controls may not be determined to be effective, which may adversely affect investor confidence in us and, as a result, the value of our Common Stock.

Our management is responsible for establishing and maintaining adequate internal control over financial reporting. Internal control over financial reporting is a process designed to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements in accordance with GAAP. We are in the very early stages of the costly and challenging process of compiling the system and

 

43

processing documentation necessary to perform the evaluation needed to comply with Section 404 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act. We may not be able to complete our evaluation, testing and any required remediation in the time required. If we are unable to assert that our internal control over financial reporting is effective, we could lose investor confidence in the accuracy and completeness of our financial reports, which would cause the price of our Common Stock to decline, and we may be subject to investigation or sanctions by the SEC.

We will be required, pursuant to Section 404 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act, to furnish a report by management on, among other things, the effectiveness of our internal control over financial reporting as of the end of the fiscal year that coincides with the filing of our second annual report on Form 10-K. This assessment will need to include disclosure of any material weaknesses identified by our management in our internal control over financial reporting. We will also be required to disclose changes made in our internal control and procedures on a quarterly basis. However, our independent registered public accounting firm will not be required to report on the effectiveness of our internal control over financial reporting pursuant to Section 404 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act until the later of the year following our first annual report required to be filed with the SEC, or the date we are no longer an “emerging growth company” as defined in the JOBS Act if we take advantage of the exemptions contained in the JOBS Act. At such time, our independent registered public accounting firm may issue a report that is adverse in the event it is not satisfied with the level at which our controls are documented, designed or operating.

Additionally, the existence of any material weakness or significant deficiency would require management to devote significant time and incur significant expense to remediate any such material weaknesses or significant deficiencies and management may not be able to remediate any such material weaknesses or significant deficiencies in a timely manner. The existence of any material weakness in our internal control over financial reporting could also result in errors in our financial statements that could require us to restate our financial statements, cause us to fail to meet our reporting obligations and cause stockholders to lose confidence in our reported financial information, all of which could materially and adversely affect our business and stock price. To comply with the requirements of being a public company, we may need to undertake various costly and time- consuming actions, such as implementing new internal controls and procedures and hiring accounting or internal audit staff, which may adversely affect our business, financial condition, results of operations, cash flows and prospects.

The JOBS Act will allow us to postpone the date by which we must comply with certain laws and regulations intended to protect investors and to reduce the amount of information we provide in our reports filed with the SEC. We cannot be certain if this reduced disclosure will make our Common Stock less attractive to investors.

The JOBS Act is intended to reduce the regulatory burden on “emerging growth companies.” As defined in the JOBS Act, a public company whose initial public offering of common equity securities occurs after December 8, 2011, and whose annual net sales are less than $1.235 billion will, in general, qualify as an “emerging growth company” until the earliest of:

 

•

the last day of its fiscal year following the fifth anniversary of the date of its initial public offering of common equity securities;

 

•

the last day of its fiscal year in which it has annual gross revenue of $1.235 billion or more;

 

•

the date on which it has, during the previous three-year period, issued more than $1 billion in nonconvertible debt; and

 

•

the date on which it is deemed to be a “large accelerated filer,” which will occur at such time as we (i) have an aggregate worldwide market value of common equity securities held by non-affiliates of $700 million or more as of the last business day of its most recently completed second fiscal quarter, (ii) have been required to file annual and quarterly reports under the Exchange, for a period of at least 12 months, and (iii) have filed at least one annual report pursuant to the Exchange Act.

 

44

Under this definition, we will be an “emerging growth company” upon completion of this offering and could remain an “emerging growth company” until as late as the fifth anniversary of the completion of this offering. For so long as we are an “emerging growth company,” we will, among other things:

 

•

not be required to comply with the auditor attestation requirements of Section 404(b) of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act;

 

•

not be required to hold a nonbinding advisory stockholder vote on executive compensation pursuant to Section 14A(a) of the Exchange Act;

 

•

not be required to seek stockholder approval of any golden parachute payments not previously approved pursuant to Section 14A(b) of the Exchange Act;

 

•

be exempt from the requirement of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board regarding the communication of critical audit matters in the auditor’s report on the financial statements; and

 

•

be subject to reduced disclosure obligations regarding executive compensation in our periodic reports and proxy statements.

In addition, Section 107 of the JOBS Act provides that an emerging growth company can use the extended transition period provided in Section 7(a)(2)(B) of the Securities Act for complying with new or revised accounting standards. This permits an emerging growth company to delay the adoption of certain accounting standards until those standards would otherwise apply to private companies. We have chosen to “opt out” of this transition period and, as a result, we will comply with new or revised accounting standards as required when they are adopted. This decision to opt out of the extended transition period is irrevocable.

We cannot predict if investors will find our Common Stock less attractive as a result of our decision to take advantage of some or all of the reduced disclosure requirements above. If some investors find our Common Stock less attractive as a result, there may be a less active trading market for our Common Stock and our stock price may be more volatile.

The historical financial information in this prospectus may make it difficult to accurately predict our costs of operations in the future.

The historical financial information in this prospectus does not reflect the added costs we expect to incur as a public company or the resulting changes that will occur in our capital structure and operations. For more information on our historical financial information, see “Summary Historical Consolidated Financial and Other Data,” “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations,” “Corporate Conversion,” and our consolidated financial statements included elsewhere in this prospectus.

We are not contractually obligated to pay regular cash dividends on our Common Stock following this offering. As a result, you may not receive any return on investment unless you sell your Common Stock for a price greater than that which you paid for it.

We are not contractually obligated to pay regular cash dividends on our Common Stock following this offering. Any decision to declare and pay dividends in the future will be made at the discretion of our board of directors and will depend on, among other things, general and economic conditions, our results of operations and financial condition, our available cash and current and anticipated cash needs, capital requirements, contractual, legal, tax, and regulatory restrictions, and such other factors that our board of directors may deem relevant. In addition, our ability to pay dividends is, and may be, limited by covenants of any future outstanding indebtedness we or our subsidiaries incur. Therefore, any return on investment in our Common Stock may be solely dependent upon the appreciation of the price of our Common Stock on the open market, which may not occur. See “Dividend Policy” for more detail.

 

45

The requirements of being a public company may strain our resources and distract our management, which could make it difficult to manage our business, particularly after we are no longer an “emerging growth company.”

As a public company, we will incur legal, accounting and other expenses that we did not previously incur. We will become subject to the reporting requirements of the Exchange Act and the Sarbanes-Oxley Act, the listing requirements of NYSE and other applicable securities rules and regulations. Compliance with these rules and regulations will increase our legal and financial compliance costs, make some activities more difficult, time-consuming or costly and increase demand on our systems and resources, particularly after we are no longer an “emerging growth company.” The Exchange Act requires that we file annual, quarterly and current reports with respect to our business, financial condition, results of operations, cash flows and prospects. The Sarbanes-Oxley Act requires, among other things, that we establish and maintain effective internal controls and procedures for financial reporting. Furthermore, the need to establish the corporate infrastructure demanded of a public company may divert our management’s attention from implementing our growth strategy, which could prevent us from improving our business, financial condition, results of operations, cash flows and prospects. We have made, and will continue to make, changes to our internal controls and procedures for financial reporting and accounting systems to meet our reporting obligations as a public company. However, the measures we take may not be sufficient to satisfy our obligations as a public company. In addition, these rules and regulations will increase our legal and financial compliance costs and will make some activities more time-consuming and costly. For example, we expect these rules and regulations to make it more difficult and more expensive for us to obtain director and officer liability insurance, and we may be required to incur substantial costs to maintain the same or similar coverage. These additional obligations could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition, results of operations, cash flows and prospects.

In addition, changing laws, regulations and standards relating to corporate governance and public disclosure are creating uncertainty for public companies, increasing legal and financial compliance costs and making some activities more time-consuming. These laws, regulations and standards are subject to varying interpretations, in many cases due to their lack of specificity, and, as a result, their application in practice may evolve over time as new guidance is provided by regulatory and governing bodies. This could result in continuing uncertainty regarding compliance matters and higher costs necessitated by ongoing revisions to disclosure and governance practices. We intend to invest resources to comply with evolving laws, regulations and standards, and this investment may result in increased general and administrative expenses and a diversion of our management’s time and attention from revenue-generating activities to compliance activities. If our efforts to comply with new laws, regulations and standards differ from the activities intended by regulatory or governing bodies due to ambiguities related to their application and practice, regulatory authorities may initiate legal proceedings against us and there could be a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition, results of operations, cash flows and prospects.

Certain provisions of Delaware law and anti-takeover provisions in our organizational documents could delay or prevent a change of control.

Certain provisions of Delaware law and our certificate of incorporation (“Charter”) and bylaws (“Bylaws”) may have an anti-takeover effect and may delay, defer, or prevent a merger, acquisition, tender offer, takeover attempt, or other change of control transaction that a stockholder might consider in its best interest, including those attempts that might result in a premium over the market price for the shares held by our stockholders. These provisions provide for, among other things:

 

•

the ability of our board of directors to issue one or more series of preferred stock without stockholder approval;

 

•

our stockholders may not take action by consent without a meeting, may only take action at a meeting of stockholders;

 

•

vacancies on our board of directors will be able to be filled only by our board of directors and not by stockholders;

 

46

•

advance notice procedures apply for stockholders to nominate candidates for election as directors or to bring matters before an annual meeting of stockholders;

 

•

stockholders will be unable to call a special meeting of stockholders;

 

•

no cumulative voting in the election of directors;

 

•

directors may be removed only for cause and only upon the affirmative vote of holders of at least 66 2/3% of the voting power of our outstanding shares of capital stock entitled to vote thereon; and

 

•

that certain provisions of the Charter may be amended only by the affirmative vote of holder of at least 66 2/3% of the voting power of our then-outstanding capital stock entitled to vote thereon.

These anti-takeover provisions could make it more difficult for a third party to acquire us, even if the third party’s offer may be considered beneficial by many of our stockholders. As a result, our stockholders may be limited in their ability to obtain a premium for their shares.

In addition, we have opted out of Section 203 of the General Corporation Law of the State of Delaware (the “DGCL”), but our Charter provides that engaging in any of a broad range of business combinations with any “interested” stockholder (generally defined as any stockholder with 15% or more of our outstanding voting stock and any entity or person affiliated with or controlling or controlled by such stockholder) for a period of three years following the time on which the stockholder became an “interested” stockholder is prohibited, subject to certain exceptions (except with respect to the Existing Owners and any of their respective affiliates and any of their respective direct or indirect transferees of our Common Stock). See “Description of Capital Stock.”

Our Charter will designate the Court of Chancery of the State of Delaware as the exclusive forum for certain litigation that may be initiated by our stockholders and the federal district courts of the United States as the exclusive forum for litigation arising under the Securities Act, which could limit our stockholders’ ability to obtain a favorable judicial forum for disputes with us.

Pursuant to our Charter to be effective in connection with the closing of this offering, unless we consent in writing to the selection of an alternative forum, the Court of Chancery of the State of Delaware (or, if the Court of Chancery does not have jurisdiction, the United States District Court for the District of Delaware) will, to the fullest extent permitted by law, be the sole and exclusive forum for (i) derivative action, suit or proceeding brought on behalf of our Company, (ii) action, suit or proceeding asserting a claim of breach of a fiduciary duty owed by any current or former director, officer or other employee or stockholder of the Company to the Company or to the Company’s stockholders, (iii) action, suit or proceeding arising pursuant to any provision of the DGCL or our Charter or our Bylaws or as to which the DGCL confers jurisdiction to the Court of Chancery of the state of Delaware, or (iv) action, suit or proceeding asserting a claim against our Company governed by the internal affairs doctrine. This provision would not apply to any action or proceeding asserting a claim under the Securities Act or the Exchange Act for which the federal courts have exclusive jurisdiction or any other claim for which the federal courts have exclusive jurisdiction. Furthermore, our Charter will also provide that, unless we consent in writing to the selection of an alternative forum, the federal district courts of the United States will be the sole and exclusive forum for the resolution of any complaint asserting a cause of action arising under the Securities Act, Exchange Act or any other claim for which federal courts of the United States have exclusive jurisdiction, against us or any director, officer, employee or agent of ours. However, Section 22 of the Securities Act creates concurrent jurisdiction for federal and state courts over all suits brought to enforce a duty or liability created by the Securities Act or the rules and regulations thereunder; accordingly, we cannot be certain that a court would enforce such provision. Our Charter will further provide that any person or entity purchasing or otherwise acquiring any interest in shares of our capital stock is deemed to have notice of and consented to the provisions of our Charter described above; however, investors cannot waive compliance with the federal securities laws and the rules and regulations thereunder. See “Description of Capital Stock—Exclusive Forum.” The forum selection provisions in our Charter may have the effect of discouraging lawsuits against us or our directors and officers and may limit our stockholders’ ability to obtain a favorable judicial forum for disputes

 

47

with us. If the enforceability of our forum selection provision were to be challenged, we may incur additional costs associated with resolving such a challenge. While we currently have no basis to expect any such challenge would be successful, if a court were to find our forum selection provision to be inapplicable or unenforceable, we may incur additional costs associated with having to litigate in other jurisdictions, which could have an adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations and result in a diversion of the time and resources of our employees, management and Board.

If you purchase shares of Common Stock in this offering, you will suffer immediate and substantial dilution of your investment.

The initial public offering price of our Common Stock is substantially higher than the net tangible book value per share of our Common Stock. Therefore, if you purchase shares of our Common Stock in this offering, you will pay a price per share that substantially exceeds our net tangible book value per share after this offering. You will experience immediate dilution of $   per share, representing the difference between our net tangible book value per share after giving effect to this offering and the initial public offering price. In addition, investors who purchase Common Stock from us in this offering will have contributed   % of the aggregate price paid by all purchasers of our outstanding equity but will own only approximately   % of our outstanding equity after this offering. See “Dilution” for more detail, including the calculation of the net tangible book value per share of our Common Stock.

An active, liquid trading market for our Common Stock may not develop, which may limit your ability to sell your shares.

Prior to this offering, there was no public market for our Common Stock. Although we have applied to have our Common Stock approved for listing on NYSE under the trading symbol “AII,” an active trading market for our Common Stock may never develop or be sustained following this offering. The initial public offering price was determined by negotiations between us and the underwriters and may not be indicative of market prices of our Common Stock that will prevail in the open market after the offering. A public trading market having the desirable characteristics of depth, liquidity and orderliness depends upon the existence of willing buyers and sellers at any given time, such existence being dependent upon the individual decisions of buyers and sellers over which neither we nor any market maker has control. The failure of an active and liquid trading market to develop and continue would likely have a material adverse effect on the value of our Common Stock. The market price of our Common Stock may decline below the initial public offering price, and you may not be able to sell your shares of our Common Stock at or above the price you paid in this offering, or at all. An inactive market may also impair our ability to raise capital to continue to fund operations by issuing additional shares of our Common Stock or other equity or equity-linked securities and may impair our ability to make acquisitions by using any such securities as consideration.

A significant portion of our total outstanding shares of Common Stock are restricted from immediate resale but may be sold into the market in the near future. This could cause the market price of our Common Stock to drop significantly, even if our business is doing well.

Sales of a substantial number of shares of our Common Stock in the public market could occur at any time. These sales, or the perception in the market that the holders of a large number of shares of Common Stock intend to sell shares, could reduce the market price of our Common Stock. After this offering, we will have    shares of Common Stock outstanding. This includes shares of Common Stock that we and the Selling Stockholders are selling in this offering, which may be resold in the public market immediately. Following the consummation of this offering, substantially all of the shares that are not being sold in this offering will be subject to a 180-day lock-up period provided under lock-up agreements executed in connection with this offering described in “Underwriting” and restricted from immediate resale under the federal securities laws as described in “Shares Eligible for Future Sale.” All of these shares of Common Stock will, however, be able to be resold after the expiration of the lock-up period, as well as pursuant to customary exceptions thereto or upon the waiver of the

 

48

lock-up agreement by the representatives on behalf of the underwriters. We also intend to register shares of Common Stock that we may issue under our equity compensation plans. Once we register these shares, they can be freely sold in the public market upon issuance, subject to the lock-up agreements. As restrictions on resale end, the market price of our stock could decline if the holders of currently restricted shares of Common Stock sell them or are perceived by the market as intending to sell them.

If securities or industry analysts do not publish research or reports about our business, if they publish unfavorable research or reports, or adversely change their recommendations regarding our Common Stock or if our results of operations do not meet their expectations, our stock price and trading volume could decline.

If a trading market for our Common Stock develops, the trading market will be influenced by the research and reports that industry or securities analysts publish about us or our business. We do not have any control over these analysts. As a newly public company, we may be slow to attract research coverage. In the event we obtain securities or industry analyst coverage, if any of the analysts who cover us provide inaccurate or unfavorable research, issue an adverse opinion regarding our stock price or if our results of operations do not meet their expectations, our stock price could decline. Moreover, if one or more of these analysts cease coverage of us or fail to publish reports on us regularly, we could lose visibility in the financial markets, which in turn could cause our stock price or trading volume to decline.

We may issue shares of preferred stock in the future, which could make it difficult for another company to acquire us or could otherwise adversely affect holders of our Common Stock, which could depress the price of our Common Stock.

Our Charter will authorize us to issue one or more series of preferred stock. Our Board will have the authority to determine the preferences, limitations and relative rights of the shares of preferred stock and to fix the number of shares constituting any series and the designation of such series, without any further vote or action by our stockholders. Our preferred stock could be issued with voting, liquidation, dividend and other rights superior to the rights of our Common Stock. The potential issuance of preferred stock may delay or prevent a change in control of us, discouraging bids for our Common Stock at a premium to the market price, and materially adversely affect the market price and the voting and other rights of the holders of our Common Stock.

We have broad discretion to use the proceeds from this offering, and our investment of those proceeds may not yield a favorable return.

Our management has broad discretion to spend the proceeds from this offering in ways with which you may not agree. See “Use of Proceeds” and “Certain Relationships and Related Party Transactions.” The failure of our management to apply these funds effectively could result in unfavorable returns. This could harm our business and could cause the price of our Common Stock to decline.

 

49

CAUTIONARY NOTE REGARDING FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS

This prospectus contains forward-looking statements. All statements other than statements of historical facts contained in this prospectus may be forward-looking statements. Statements regarding our future results of operations and financial position, business strategy, and plans and objectives of management for future operations, including, among others, statements regarding the Corporate Conversion, including the consummation of this offering, expected growth and future capital expenditures are forward-looking statements. In some cases, you can identify forward-looking statements by terms, such as “anticipates,” “believes,” “contemplates,” “continue,” “could,” “estimates,” “expects,” “intends,” “may,” “plans,” “potential,” “predicts,” “projects,” “should,” “targets,” or the negative of these terms or other similar expressions. Accordingly, we caution you that any such forward-looking statements are not guarantees of future performance and are subject to risks, assumptions, and uncertainties that are difficult to predict. Although we believe that the expectations reflected in these forward- looking statements are reasonable as of the date made, actual results may prove to be materially different from the results expressed or implied by the forward-looking statements.

Forward-looking statements contained in this prospectus include, but are not limited to, statements about:

 

•

our market opportunity and the potential growth of that market;

 

•

our ability to write new policies and renew existing ones;

 

•

our ability to maintain adequate reinsurance programs;

 

•

legal and regulatory developments in the state of Florida;

 

•

our strategy, expected outcomes, and growth prospects;

 

•

trends in our operations, industry, and markets;

 

•

our future profitability, indebtedness, liquidity, access to capital, and financial condition;

 

•

the effects of seasonal trends on our results of operations;

 

•

the increased expenses associated with being a public company;

 

•

our ability to remain in compliance with extensive laws and regulations that apply to our business and operations;

 

•

the effect our dual class structure may have on the market price of our Common Stock; and

 

•

the future trading prices of our Common Stock.

We caution you that the foregoing list may not contain all of the forward-looking statements made in this prospectus.

We have based these forward-looking statements largely on our current expectations and projections about future events and trends that we believe may affect our financial condition, results of operations, business strategy, short-term and long-term business operations and objectives, and financial needs. These forward-looking statements are subject to a number of risks, uncertainties, and assumptions, including those described in the section titled “Risk Factors.” Moreover, we operate in a very competitive and rapidly changing environment.

New risks emerge from time to time. It is not possible for our management to predict all risks, nor can we assess the impact of all factors on our business or the extent to which any factor, or combination of factors, may cause actual results to differ materially from those contained in any forward-looking statements we may make. In light of these risks, uncertainties, and assumptions, the future events and trends discussed in this prospectus may not occur and actual results could differ materially and adversely from those anticipated or implied in the forward- looking statements.

 

50

CORPORATE CONVERSION

We currently operate as a Texas limited liability company under the name American Integrity Insurance Group, LLC, which directly and indirectly holds all of the equity interests in our operating subsidiaries. Immediately after the effectiveness of the registration statement of which this prospectus forms a part, American Integrity Insurance Group, LLC will convert into a Delaware corporation pursuant to a statutory conversion and will change its name to American Integrity Insurance Group, Inc. In this prospectus, we refer to all of the transactions related to our conversion into a corporation as the Corporate Conversion.

The purpose of the Corporate Conversion is to reorganize our corporate structure so that the entity that is offering our Common Stock to the public in this offering is a corporation rather than a limited liability company and so that our existing equity holders will own our Common Stock rather than membership interests in a limited liability company.

In conjunction with the Corporate Conversion, all of our outstanding membership interests will be converted into an aggregate of shares of our Common Stock. The number of       shares of Common Stock issuable in connection with the Corporate Conversion will be determined pursuant to the applicable provisions of the plan of conversion.

As a result of the Corporate Conversion, American Integrity Insurance Group, Inc. will succeed to all of the property and assets of American Integrity Insurance Group, LLC and will succeed to all of the debts and obligations of American Integrity Insurance Group, LLC. American Integrity Insurance Group, Inc. will be governed by a certificate of incorporation filed with the Delaware Secretary of State and bylaws, the material provisions of which are described under the heading “Description of Capital Stock.” On the effective date of the Corporate Conversion, each of our directors and officers will be as described elsewhere in this prospectus. See “Management.”

Except as otherwise noted herein, our consolidated financial statements included elsewhere in this prospectus are those of American Integrity Insurance Group, LLC and its consolidated operations. We do not expect that the Corporate Conversion will have an effect on our results of operations.

 

51

DIVIDEND POLICY

We currently intend to retain any future earnings for use in the operation of our business and do not intend to declare or pay any cash dividends in the foreseeable future. The profitability of our business fluctuates each year based on a variety of factors, including the frequency and severity of catastrophe storms in the Southeast U.S., and in years where we generate excess profit we may look to return excess capital to stockholders via dividends or other capital return mechanisms. Any further determination to pay dividends on our capital stock will be at the discretion of our board of directors, subject to applicable laws, and will depend on our financial condition, results of operations, capital requirements, general business conditions, and other factors that our board of directors considers relevant. Our future ability to pay cash dividends on our Common Stock may also be limited by the terms of any future debt securities, preferred stock or credit facility. If we elect to pay dividends in the future, we may reduce or elect to discontinue the payment of such dividends at any time.

To the extent we rely on dividends from AIICFL to pay dividends to our stockholders, the maximum amount of dividends that can be paid by Florida insurance companies without prior approval of the FLOIR is subject to restrictions. Dividends from AIICFL can only be paid from accumulated unassigned funds derived from net operating profits and net realized capital gains. Subject to such accumulated unassigned funds, the maximum dividend that may be paid by AIICFL to the Company without prior approval is further limited to the lesser of statutory net income from operations of the preceding calendar year or statutory unassigned surplus as of the preceding year end. As of the date hereof, AIICFL has not declared dividends.

 

52

USE OF PROCEEDS

We estimate, based upon an assumed initial public offering price of $    per share (the midpoint of the price range set forth on the cover page of this prospectus), that we will receive net proceeds from this offering of approximately $    million after deducting the underwriting discount.

We intend to use the net proceeds from this offering for general corporate purposes, which may include contributing capital to AIICFL to support growth. Additionally, we intend to use a portion of the net proceeds from this offering to satisfy tax withholding and remittance obligations related to the Restricted Stock Grant Net Settlement. Based on an assumed initial public offering price of $     per share of Common Stock which is the midpoint of the price range set forth on the cover page of this prospectus, an estimated      shares of Common Stock will be issued in connection with the Restricted Stock Grant and an assumed  % tax withholding rate, we would use approximately $     of the net proceeds for this offering to satisfy our tax withholding and remittance obligations related to the issuance of the Restricted Stock Grant. A $1.00 increase (decrease) in the assumed initial public offering price of $     per share of Common Stock which is the midpoint of the price range set forth on the cover page of this prospectus, assuming no change to the applicable tax rate, would increase (decrease) the amount we would be required to pay to satisfy these tax withholding and remittance obligations by approximately $    .

We will not receive any proceeds from the sales of Common Stock by the Selling Stockholders in this offering. We will, however, bear the costs associated with the sale of shares of Common Stock by the Selling Stockholders, other than underwriting discounts and commissions.

This expected use of the net proceeds from this offering represents our intentions based upon our current plans and business conditions, which could change in the future as our plans and business conditions evolve. We cannot predict with certainty all of the particular uses for the net proceeds to be received upon the closing of this offering or the amounts that we will actually spend on the uses set forth above. As a result, our management will retain broad discretion over the allocation of the net proceeds from this offering.

Assuming no exercise of the underwriters’ option to purchase additional shares of Common Stock, each $1.00 increase (decrease) in the assumed initial public offering price of $    per share (the midpoint of the price range set forth on the cover page of this prospectus) would increase (decrease) the net proceeds to us from this offering by approximately $    million, assuming the number of shares offered, as set forth on the cover page of this prospectus, remains the same, and after deducting the underwriting discount.

Each 1,000,000 share increase (decrease) in the number of shares offered by us in this offering would increase (decrease) the net proceeds to us by approximately $    million assuming that the price per share for the offering remains at $    (the midpoint of the price range set forth on the cover page of this prospectus), and after deducting the underwriting discount.

 

53

CAPITALIZATION

The following table describes our cash and consolidated capitalization as of December 31, 2024:

 

•

of AIIG LLC on an actual basis;

 

•

of the Company on an as adjusted basis, after giving effect to the Corporate Conversion, the Restricted Stock Grant Net Settlement and our issuance of     shares of Common Stock in this offering at an assumed initial public offering price of $    per share (the midpoint of the price range set forth on the cover page of this prospectus) in addition to the grant of     shares of restricted stock to certain members of management in the Restricted Stock Grant, after deducting the estimated underwriting discounts and commissions and estimated offering expenses payable by us (assuming no exercise of the underwriters’ option to purchase additional shares of Common Stock) and the application of the net proceeds of this offering as set forth in “Use of Proceeds.”

For more information, please see “Corporate Conversion,” and “Use of Proceeds” included elsewhere in this prospectus. You should read this information in conjunction with our financial statements and the related notes included elsewhere in this prospectus and the “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations” section and other financial information contained in this prospectus.

 

As of December 31, 2024

(dollars in thousands, except share and per share data and footnotes)

AIIG LLC Actual

Company, as adjusted for the Corporate Conversion and Restricted Stock Grant

Company, as adjusted for this Offering

Cash and cash equivalents

$

$

$

Long-term debt

Members’/Stockholders’ equity:

Class A Units

Class C Units

Common Stock, $0.001 par value per share,     shares authorized, no shares issued and outstanding, actuals,     shares authorized,     shares issued and outstanding, on a pro forma basis,     shares authorized, shares issued and outstanding, on a pro forma as adjusted basis

Retained earnings

Accumulated other comprehensive (loss) income

Additional paid-in capital

Total member’s / stockholders’ equity

Total capitalization

$

$

$

A $1.00 increase or decrease in the assumed initial public offering price of $     per share, which is the midpoint of the price range set forth on the cover page of this prospectus, would increase or decrease each of cash, total stockholders’ equity and total capitalization on a pro forma basis by approximately $     million, assuming the number of shares of Common Stock offered, as set forth on the cover page of this prospectus, remains the same, and after deducting the estimated underwriting discounts and commissions and estimated offering expenses payable by us. Each 1,000,000 share increase or decrease in the number of shares of Common Stock offered in this offering would increase or decrease each of cash, total stockholders’ equity and total capitalization on a pro forma basis by approximately $     million, based on an assumed initial public offering price of $     per share (the midpoint of the price range set forth on the cover page of this prospectus), and after deducting the estimated underwriting discounts and commissions and estimated offering expenses payable by us.

 

54

A $1.00 increase (decrease) in the assumed initial public offering price of $     per share of Common Stock, which is the midpoint of the price range set forth on the cover page of this prospectus, assuming no change to the applicable tax rate, would increase (decrease) the amount we would be required to pay to satisfy these tax withholding and remittance obligations of the Restricted Stock Grant Net Settlement by approximately $    .

 

55

DILUTION

If you invest in our Common Stock in this offering, your investment will be immediately diluted to the extent of the difference between the initial public offering price per share of our Common Stock and the pro forma as adjusted net tangible book value per share of our Common Stock after this offering.

Dilution results from the fact that the initial public offering price per share of the Common Stock exceeds the pro forma as adjusted net tangible book value per share of Common Stock after this offering. Pro forma net tangible book value per share is determined by subtracting our total liabilities from the total book value of our tangible assets and dividing the difference by the number of shares of Common Stock, after giving effect to the Corporate Conversion, the Restricted Stock Grant Net Settlement and this offering, including the sale of     shares of Common Stock in this offering at the assumed initial public offering price of $    per share (the midpoint of the price range set forth on the cover page of this prospectus). Our pro forma net tangible book value, as of December 31, 2024 was $    million, or $    per share of Common Stock. This represents an immediate increase in pro forma net tangible book value to the Existing Owners of $    per share and an immediate dilution to new investors in this offering of $    per share. We determine dilution by subtracting the pro forma as adjusted net tangible book value per share after this offering from the amount of cash that a new investor paid for a share of Common Stock.

The following table illustrates the dilution that a purchaser of our Common Stock in this offering will incur given the assumptions above:

 

Assumed initial public offering price per share		$
Pro forma net tangible book value per share as of December 31, 2024 before this offering(1)		$
Increase in net tangible book value per share attributable to the investors in this offering		$
Pro forma as adjusted net tangible book value (deficit) per share after this offering		$
Dilution in net tangible book value per share to the investors in this offering		$

 

(1)	The computation of pro forma net tangible book value per share as of December 31, 2024 before this offering is set forth below:

 

(in thousands, except per share data)
Book value of tangible assets		$
Less: total liabilities		$
Pro forma net tangible book value(a)		$
Shares of Common Stock outstanding(a)		$

 

(a)	Gives pro forma effect to the Corporate Conversion and the Restricted Stock Grant Net Settlement (but not this offering).

A $1.00 increase or decrease in the assumed initial public offering price of $    per share (the midpoint of the price range set forth on the cover page of this prospectus), would increase or decrease pro forma net tangible book value by approximately $    and would increase or decrease in pro forma net tangible book value the dilution per share to the investors in this offering by $    based on the assumptions set forth above.

The discussion and tables above assume no exercise of the underwriters’ option to purchase additional shares. If the underwriters exercise their option to purchase additional shares in full, after giving effect to the Assumed Redemption, the pro forma as adjusted net tangible book value (deficit) per share after this offering would be $    per share, and the dilution in the pro forma as adjusted net tangible book value (deficit) per share to the investors in this offering would be $    per share.

 

56

The following table summarizes as of December 31, 2024, on a pro forma as adjusted basis as described above, after giving effect to the Corporate Conversion, the Restricted Stock Grant Net Settlement and this offering, the number of shares of Common Stock purchased from us, the total consideration paid to us, and the average price per share paid by the Existing Owners and our other existing holders and by the investors purchasing shares in this offering. The calculation below is based upon an assumed initial public offering price of $    per share (the midpoint of the price range set forth on the cover page of this prospectus), and before deducting estimated underwriting discounts and commissions and offering expenses payable by us, and the use of the net proceeds of this offering after giving effect to the Assumed Redemption:

 

		Shares Purchased								Total Consideration								Average Price Per Share
		Number				Percent				Amount				Percent
Existing Owners								%		$						%		$
New investors
Total							100	%		$					100	%		$

The tables and calculations above are based on the number of shares of Common Stock outstanding as of December 31, 2024, after giving effect to the Corporate Conversion and this offering and the Restricted Stock Grant Net Settlement and includes      shares of restricted stock granted to certain members of management as described in “Executive Compensation—Compensation Arrangements to be Entered into in Connection with this Offering.” If the underwriters’ option to purchase additional shares is exercised in full, after giving effect to the Assumed Redemption, the Existing Owners would own approximately     %, and the investors in this offering would own approximately     % of the total number of shares of our Common Stock outstanding after this offering. Sales by the Selling Stockholders in this offering will reduce the number of shares of Common Stock held by the Existing Owners to    , or approximately    % of the total number of shares of Common Stock issued and outstanding after this offering, and will increase the number of shares of Common Stock held by new investors to    , or approximately    % of the total number of of shares of Common Stock issued and outstanding after this offering. To the extent that any new options or other equity incentive grants are issued in the future with an exercise price or purchase price below the initial public offering price, new investors will experience further dilution.

We may choose to raise additional capital due to market conditions or strategic considerations even if we believe we have sufficient funds for our current or future operating plans. To the extent additional capital is raised through the sale of equity or equity-linked securities, the issuance of these securities could result in further dilution to our stockholders.

 

57

MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS

The following discussion provides a detailed analysis of our financial condition, results of operations, liquidity, and capital resources. Investors should read this section alongside our audited financial statements and related notes included in this prospectus. This analysis includes forward-looking statements, which are subject to various risks and uncertainties. Actual results may differ from projections due to factors beyond our control, as detailed in the ‘Risk Factors’ section. Unless otherwise indicated, the historical financial information presented in “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations” does not give pro forma effect to the Corporate Conversion. References to the “Company,” “American Integrity,” “we,” “us” or “our” refer to American Integrity Insurance Group, Inc.

Overview

We are a profitable and growing insurance group headquartered in Tampa, Florida. Through our insurance carrier subsidiary, American Integrity Insurance Company of Florida, Inc. (“AIICFL”), we provide personal residential property insurance for single-family homeowners and condominium owners, as well as coverage for vacant dwellings and investment properties, predominantly in Florida. 98.6% of our direct premiums written (“DPW”) for the year ended December 31, 2024 and 97.6% of our policies in-force as of December 31, 2024 were in Florida.

We strive to generate consistent adjusted underwriting profits, exclusive of investment income or gains and losses from the sale of invested assets. Our goal is to achieve long-term profitability across economic and insurance cycles by maintaining a conservative financial position, increasing premiums written and risk exposure when we believe market conditions are favorable, and reducing risk exposure during periods when we believe market conditions are unfavorable and earning profits is more challenging. AIICFL, our statutory insurance carrier, maintains a Financial Stability Rating of “A” (Exceptional) by Demotech, and a financial strength rating of “BBB+” with a stable outlook from the Kroll Bond Rating Agency. Additionally, the Company maintains a BB+ rating, with stable outlook, from the Kroll Bond Rating Agency, LLC.

We generate revenue primarily from insurance premiums earned, net of reinsurance ceded. We also generate revenue from policy fees, installment income fees, income generated through the investment of our assets, and realized gains or losses on the sale of our invested assets. Our financial results are highly seasonal due to the occurrence of hurricanes and tropical storms typically between June 1^st and November 30^th of each year in Florida and the other states in which we operate. Our reinsurance purchasing, including our catastrophe excess of loss reinsurance coverages, which commence on June 1^st annually, also materially influence our financial results and are impacted by changes in reinsurance rates or alterations in terms and conditions, including in attachment or loss retention levels.

Key Factors Affecting Our Results of Operations and Comparability Between Periods

Florida Trends. The legal and regulatory environment in Florida has historically posed challenges for property and casualty insurers in 2022, particularly due to excessive litigation and fraudulent claims practices. Prior to recent legislative reforms, issues such as assignment of benefits abuse, extended statute of limitations, and attorney fee multipliers led to disproportionately high litigation rates in Florida relative to other geographies. These factors increased claims costs and reinsurance expenses, impacting the profitability of insurers operating in Florida. Recent legislative changes, however, have improved operating conditions in the Florida market, including reducing non-hurricane-related claims lawsuits by 24.3% since December 2022. We believe these legislative reforms provide greater opportunities for us to profitably underwrite residential property insurance in Florida.

Citizens “Take-out” Program. In late 2024, we strategically expanded our policy base, assuming 68,844 policies, representing $112.4 million in assumed unearned premiums from Citizens Property Insurance

 

58

Corporation (“Citizens”). These policies carry no upfront acquisition costs and are captured in our current treaty year reinsurance program.

Over the past decade, market conditions did not support take-outs from Citizens that aligned with our underwriting and profitability standards. Prior to 2024, our last assumption of policies from Citizens was in 2014. However, we believe recent regulatory changes, improvements in the data that is made available on Citizens policies and rate increases implemented by Citizens making pricing more comparable to what we charge in the Voluntary Market have made the opportunity to assume policies from Citizens more attractive.

Take-out opportunities, however, are subject to a number of market, timing and execution risks, and future take-out opportunities may or may not materialize.

Changing Climate Conditions. Over the past two decades, the increasing frequency and severity of severe weather events have highlighted the unpredictable nature of climate trends. Climate change has the potential to influence the occurrence and intensity of natural disasters, including convective storms, hurricanes, tornadoes, hailstorms, severe winter storms, and flooding, among others. This unpredictability creates challenges in assessing future risks and exposures.

In response, we have implemented adaptive underwriting strategies and enhanced our reinsurance programs to mitigate potential impacts. We continuously monitor climate data and collaborate with climate change and catastrophe modeling experts to refine our risk assessment models, enhancing our preparedness for evolving climate-related challenges.

Seasonality of our Business. Our business is seasonal as hurricanes and other named storms typically occur in the geographies where we operate between June 1^st and November 30^th of each year. This may result in variability in our losses and loss adjustment expenses (“LAE”) depending on the number, location and strength of hurricanes and other named storms during these months as compared to other months. In addition, because our catastrophe reinsurance program renews on June 1^st each year, the ceded premiums written recorded in the second quarter are typically substantially higher than any other quarter during a fiscal year. In some instances, this will cause our reported net premiums written to be negative (or substantially lower than other quarters) in the second quarter of each year.

Inflation. We may be adversely affected during periods of high inflation, primarily because of increased labor and material costs, which could cause claims and claim expenses to increase. This has been evident since the COVID pandemic in early 2020. In addition, periods of high inflation can lead to periods of high interest rates, which may impact the performance of our investment portfolio. The impact of inflation on our results cannot be known with any certainty; however, we revise our reserves for unpaid losses as additional information becomes available, and reflect adjustments to our reserves, if any, in our earnings in the periods in which we determine the adjustments are necessary. We factor future expectations for inflation in the pricing of our new business and renewal policies.

Cost and Availability of Reinsurance. We purchase excess of loss and quota share reinsurance as part of our capital management strategy and in an effort to reduce volatility of earnings and protect our balance sheet from the impact of potential catastrophic events. Our ability to implement an effective reinsurance strategy is dependent, in part, on the cost and availability of reinsurance coverage. In recent years, reinsurance rates have significantly increased and terms and conditions have tightened (including reductions on what we are able to charge for claims administration), particularly for catastrophe exposed property lines of business. This can be attributed to a confluence of factors, including high inflation and a rising interest rate environment, social inflation, the frequency and severity of natural catastrophes including large hurricanes in Florida such as Hurricane Ian and Milton, and reinsurance capacity constraints. We ceded 73.3% and 69.5% of our gross premiums earned in the years ended December 31, 2024 and December 31, 2023, respectively.

 

59

Offering-Related Compensation Expense.

We expect to incur a one-time share-based compensation expense of approximately $    million, based on an assumed initial offering price of $    per share (the midpoint of the price range set forth on the cover page of this prospectus), as a result of the Restricted Stock Grant. The liability and associated compensation expense for these awards will not be recognized until an offering is consummated. A $1.00 increase (decrease) in the assumed initial public offering price of $    per share of Common Stock, which is the midpoint of the price range set forth on the cover page of this prospectus, assuming no change to the applicable tax rate, would increase (decrease) the amount we would be required to pay to satisfy these tax withholding and remittance obligations by approximately $   . For more information, see “Executive Compensation—Compensation Arrangements to be Entered into in Connection with this Offering.”

Results of Operations

Year Ended December 31, 2024 Compared to Year Ended December 31, 2023

The following table summarizes our results of operations for the years ended December 31, 2024 and December 31, 2023.

 

		Year Ended December 31,
		2024				2023				Change				% Change
($ in thousands)
Gross premiums written		$	767,678			$	640,990				126,688				19.8	%
Change in gross unearned premiums			(85,462	)			(50,475	)			(34,987	)			69.3	%
Gross premiums earned			682,216				590,515				91,701				15.5	%
Ceded premiums earned			(500,161	)			(410,253	)			(89,908	)			21.9	%
Net premiums earned			182,055				180,262				1,793				1.0	%
Policy fees			7,393				7,055				338				4.8	%
Net investment income			14,180				12,653				1,527				12.1	%
Net realized gains (losses) on investments			119				(22	)			141				(635.5	%)
Other income			607				923				(316	)			(34.2	%)
Total Revenues			204,354				200,871				3,483				1.7	%
Losses and loss adjustment expenses			(90,832	)			(86,749	)			4,083				4.7	%
Policy acquisition expenses			(31,532	)			(35,255	)			3,723				(10.6	%)
General and administrative expenses			(30,951	)			(34,112	)			3,161				(9.3	%)
Total Expenses			153,315				156,116				(2,801	)			(1.8	%)
Income before taxes			51,039				44,755				6,284				14.0	%
Income tax expense			11,297				6,958				4,339				62.4	%
Net Income			39,742				37,797				1,945				5.1	%
Net retention ratio1			25.3	%			21.5	%
Loss ratio2			47.9	%			46.3	%
Expense ratio3			33.0	%			37.0	%
Combined ratio4			80.9	%			83.3	%
Return on equity5			26.8	%			32.9	%
Ceded catastrophe excess of loss premiums ratio6			44.9	%			41.2	%
Underlying loss and loss adjustment expense ratio7			32.6	%			36.1	%

 

(1)	Net retention ratio is a key business metric and, expressed as a percentage, is the ratio of net premiums written to gross premiums written (“GPW”).

 

60

(2)

Loss ratio is a key business metric, and, expressed as a percentage, is the ratio of losses and LAE to net premiums earned plus policy fees. Management uses this operating metric to analyze our loss trends and believes it is useful for investors to evaluate this component separately from our other operating expenses.

(3)

Expense ratio is a key business metric, and, expressed as a percentage, is the ratio of policy acquisition expenses and general and administrative expenses to net premiums earned plus policy fees. Management uses this operating metric to analyze our expense trends and believes it is useful for investors to evaluate these components separately from our loss expenses.

(4)	Combined ratio is a key business metric, defined as the sum of the loss ratio and the expense ratio. Management uses this operating metric to analyze our total expense trends and believes it is a key indicator for investors when evaluating the overall profitability of our business.

(5)	Return on equity is a key business metric, defined as net income divided by the average beginning and ending members’ equity during the applicable period.

(6)

Ceded catastrophe excess of loss premiums ratio is a key business metric and a non-GAAP measure defined as ceded catastrophe excess of loss premiums earned divided by gross premiums earned. We view this ratio as meaningful to our business as it provides a view into the cost of our catastrophe reinsurance program. The most directly comparable financial measure generally accepted in the United States (“GAAP”) is the ratio of ceded premiums earned to gross premiums earned. The Ceded Catastrophe Excess of Loss Premiums Ratio measure should not be considered a substitute for ceded premiums earned and does not reflect the overall profitability of our business.

(7)

Underlying loss and loss adjustment expense ratio is a key business metric and a non-GAAP measure, expressed as a percentage, and defined as the ratio of loss and LAE, net, less current year net catastrophe losses and net prior year reserve development divided by net premiums earned plus policy fees. We view this ratio as meaningful to our business as it allows us to analyze our loss trends before the impact of catastrophe losses and prior year reserve development. The most directly comparable GAAP measure is net loss and LAE. The underlying loss and LAE measure should not be considered a substitute for net loss and LAE and does not reflect the overall profitability of our business.

Revenues

Gross premiums written are the amount received or to be received for insurance policies written or assumed by us during a specific period of time, in each case prior to amounts ceded to reinsurers. We utilize GPW to assess the growth of our business excluding the effects of ceded reinsurance.

GPW is generally impacted by:

 

•

Renewals of existing policies;

 

•

New business submissions;

 

•

Binding of new business submissions into policies;

 

•

Bound policies going effective;

 

•

Average premium of new and renewing policies;

 

•

Premium rates of new and renewing policies; and

 

•

Assumption of policies from third-party carriers and/or Florida state-supported insurers, including from the Citizens “depopulation” programs.

For the year ended December 31, 2024, GPW increased by $126.7 million, or 19.8%, to $767.7 million, compared to $641.0 million in 2023. This growth was primarily driven by the strategic expansion of our Citizens take-out program.

 

61

Additionally, our policies in-force increased to 356,108 as of December 31, 2024 from 274,099 as of December 31, 2023, primarily as a result of the expansion of our Citizens take-out program. The below table categorizes our policies in-force for the periods presented.

 

($ in thousands)		In-Force Premium				Policies In-Force
As of December 31, 2023
Voluntary Market		$	637,455				264,435
Citizens Legacy Take-Outs(1)		$	34,536				9,664
FY 2023 Citizens Take-Outs(2)			—				—
Total		$	671,991				274,099
As of December 31, 2024
Voluntary Market		$	661,338				280,755
Citizens Legacy Take-Outs(1)		$	29,599				7,140
FY 2024 Citizens Take-Outs(2)(3)		$	184,320				68,213
Total		$	875,257				356,108

 

(1)	Reflects policies assumed from Citizens in or prior to 2014 that have since been renewed directly with the Company. The Company did not conduct any take-outs in the years 2015 through 2023.

(2)	Reflects policies assumed from Citizens during the stated calendar year that have less than a year remaining under their current Citizens policy and will be offered a renewal policy with the Company upon expiration.

(3)	There were 68,844 policies assumed from Citizens during 2024; however, 631 of those policies were no longer in-force as of December 31, 2024.

Policies in-force represents the number of active insurance policies with coverage in effect as of the end of the period referenced. We utilize the change in the number of policies in force to assess the trajectories of our operations.

In-force premium represents the annual premium for active insurance policies with coverage in effect as of the end of the period referenced.

The following table shows the policies in-force and in-force premiums by product as of December 31, 2024 and December 31, 2023:

 

		As of December 31,
($ in thousands)		2024								2023
		Policies in-force				In-force premium				Policies in-force				In-force premium
HO-3			238,084			$	589,744				169,362			$	438,396
HO-4			3,677				1,077				4,111				1,149
HO-6			967				1,034				9,600				19,330
MHO			7,347				24,519				9,921				28,451
DP-1 Vacant			27,599				68,201				29,264				63,478
DP-3			68,986				185,513				43,756				117,393
Watercraft			3,032				4,190				2,114				2,662
Golf Cart			6,416				978				4,979				749
Other			—				—				992				382
Total			356,108			$	875,256				274,099			$	671,991

 

62

The following table shows the policies in-force and in-force premiums by county in Florida as of December 31, 2024 and December 31, 2023:

 

($ in thousands)		2024								2023
County		Policies in-force				In-force premium				Policies in-force				In-force premium
Lee			26,380			$	78,323				24,515			$	73,584
Polk			22,997				44,493				18,079				34,661
Orange			22,863				54,288				16,604				41,079
Duval			20,598				37,832				17,359				33,022
Hillsborough			19,454				49,700				16,376				43,775
Pasco			17,327				38,173				15,481				33,249
Palm Beach			16,218				68,680				3,144				15,867
Osceola			16,185				35,140				7,914				17,316
Marion			14,644				24,431				12,559				22,763
Brevard			12,588				32,407				8,209				22,272
Volusia			12,543				28,469				11,731				26,705
Other			154,311				383,320				122,128				307,698
Total			356,108			$	875,256				274,099			$	671,991

Gross premiums earned represent the earned portion of our GPW, adjusted by the change in gross unearned premium. Premiums associated with written, and assumed policies are earned ratably over the remaining term of the policy, respectively, which is typically one year.

Gross premiums earned increased to $682.2 million for the year ended December 31, 2024 from $590.5 million for the year ended December 31, 2023. The $91.7 million, or 15.5% increase in gross premiums earned was primarily due to the strategic expansion of our Citizens take-out program.

Ceded premiums written represent the GPW that are ceded to reinsurers under our reinsurance treaties. We enter into reinsurance contracts to limit our exposure to potential large catastrophe losses and severe non-catastrophe losses, and in the case of our quota share, to provide additional capacity for growth. Ceded premiums written are impacted by the level of our GPW and decisions we make from time to time to adjust our net retention levels, quota share terms, facultative reinsurance terms, property per risk terms and catastrophe excess of loss terms and capacity, as well as the pricing and availability of reinsurance generally.

Ceded premiums earned represent the earned portion of our ceded premiums written, adjusted by the change in ceded unearned premiums. We recognize the cost of our reinsurance program and ceded premiums earned ratably over the twelve-month term of the arrangements.

Ceded premiums earned increased $89.9 million, or 21.9%, to $500.2 million for the year ended December 31, 2024 from $410.3 million for the year ended December 31, 2023. The increase in ceded premiums earned was primarily due to growth in our gross premiums earned from the strategic expansion of our Citizens take-out program, as well as increased reinsurance premium rates.

Net premiums written reflect GPW, less ceded premiums written.

Net premiums earned reflect gross premiums earned, less ceded premiums earned.

Net premiums earned grew by $1.8 million, or 1.0% year-over-year, reaching $182.1 million in 2024, up from $180.2 million in 2023. This increase is primarily driven by the Citizens take-out program partially offset by an increase in catastrophe excess of loss reinsurance premiums ceded.

 

63

Policy fees represent various upfront policy fees paid by policyholders on new and renewal insurance policies. In accordance with ASC 606, policy fees are recognized and earned upon collection as they are not subject to refund, and our service obligation is fulfilled when the policy is issued.

Policy fees increased to $0.3 million, or 4.8%, $7.4 million for the year ended December 31, 2024 from $7.1 million for the year ended December 31, 2023. The increase in voluntary policies written during the year ended December 31, 2024 contributed to the increase in policy fees.

Net investment income includes interest earned from cash, cash equivalents, fixed maturity securities and short-term investments. Our invested assets primarily consist of cash and fixed-maturity securities. The primary factors affecting net investment income include the size of our investment portfolio and the yield generated by the underlying securities held in the portfolio.

Net investment income increased $1.5 million, or 12.1%, to $14.2 million for the year ended December 31, 2024 from $12.7 million for the year ended December 31, 2023. The increase in net investment income is due to an increase in invested assets primarily driven by an increase in cash and cash equivalents and fixed-maturity securities.

Net realized gains (losses) on investments reflect the differences between the amount received by us upon the sale of a security and the amortized cost of the security, as well as allowances for credit losses recognized in earnings, if any.

We continuously seek to optimize our investment portfolio. Sales of available-for-sale debt securities resulted in net realized investment gains of $0.1 million for the year ended December 31, 2024 and net realized investment losses of $22,000 for the year ended December 31, 2023.

Other income represents installment fees earned by us when policyholders elect to pay their premium over time as opposed to in full at inception of the policy and other miscellaneous items.

Other income decreased to $0.3 million, or 34.2%, $0.6 million for the year ended December 31, 2024 from $0.9 million for the year ended December 31, 2023.

Expenses

Losses and Loss Adjustment Expenses reflect losses and expenses paid to resolve claims, such as fees paid to claims adjusters, attorneys and investigators, and changes in our reserves for unpaid losses and LAE during the fiscal period, in each case net of losses and LAE ceded to reinsurers. Losses and LAE include a provision for claims that have occurred but have not yet been reported to us. These expenses are a function of the amount and type of insurance contracts we write, and the loss experience associated with the underlying coverage. Additionally, losses and LAE include the financial benefit from the management of claims, by American Integrity Claims Services, LLC, our in-house third-party administrator that earns fees for managing certain policies we issue, including claim fees ceded to reinsurers, which is an offset (contra expense) to LAE. Our losses and LAE are generally affected by:

 

•

the occurrence, frequency and severity of claims associated with the particular types of insurance contracts that we write;

 

•

the occurrence of large catastrophe weather events in the states where we operate: Florida, Georgia and South Carolina;

 

•

the reinsurance agreements we have in place at the time of a loss;

 

•

the mix of business written by us;

 

•

changes in the legal or regulatory environment related to the business we write;

 

64

•

trends in legal defense costs; and

 

•

inflation in the cost of claims including inflation related to labor and building materials.

Losses and LAE increased $4.1 million, or 4.7%, to $90.8 million for the year ended December 31, 2024 from $86.7 million for the year ended December 31, 2023. The increase in losses and LAE resulted primarily from increased incurred catastrophe losses in the amount of $32.2 million due to hurricanes Milton, Helene, and Debby, which were partially offset by a decline in attritional (i.e., non-catastrophe) losses, in part as a result of the impact of the 2022 legislative reforms on the frequency of claims litigation and an overall more favorable operating environment for insurance carriers writing in the state, resulting in decreased claims frequencies, losses and loss adjustment expenses.

Policy acquisition expenses are costs we incur in connection with the acquisition of an insurance policy including commissions paid to distribution partners at the time of policy issuance, policy administration fees paid to third-party administrators at the time of policy issuance, premium taxes, and inspection fees. These policy acquisition expenses are partially offset by ceding commission we receive from third-party reinsurers participating on our net quota share program in connection with us ceding a portion of our GPW. We recognize policy acquisition expenses and ceding commissions ratably over the term of the underlying policies. Ceding commissions are reported as a reduction to policy acquisition costs and general and administrative expenses and allocated to each based upon the proportion these costs bear to production of new business.

Policy acquisition expenses decreased $3.7 million, or 10.6%, to $31.5 million for the year ended December 31, 2024 from $35.3 million for the year ended December 31, 2023. The decrease is primarily attributable to an increase in policy acquisition costs more than offset our net quota share reinsurance ceding commissions.

General and administrative expenses consist of expenses of our operations including employee compensation and benefits, technology costs, facilities costs and professional services fees, including legal, accounting and actuarial fees, as well as general corporate overhead expenses. As noted above, a certain portion of our ceding commissions are allocated to general and administrative expenses.

General and administrative expenses decreased $3.2 million, or 9.3%, to $31.0 million for the year ended December 31, 2024 from $34.1 million for the year ended December 31, 2023. The decrease was due primarily to an increase in non-catastrophe ceded commissions and no acquisition costs on the Citizens policies.

Income tax expense relates to federal and state income taxes. The amount of income tax expense or benefit recorded in future periods will depend on the jurisdictions in which we operate and the tax laws and regulations in effect. In connection with the proposed offering and the Corporate Conversion, the Company will be subject to payment of U.S. federal and state income taxes.

Income tax expense was $11.3 million and $7.0 million for the year ended December 31, 2024 and 2023, respectively. Our effective tax rate for the year ended December 31, 2024 and 2023 was 22.1% and 15.6%, respectively. The increase was primarily due to a reduction in the losses related to pass-through entities not subject to income tax.

Key Business Metrics and Ratios

Net retention ratio, expressed as a percentage, is the ratio of net premiums written to GPW. Our net retention ratio increased to 25.3% for the year ended December 31, 2024 from 21.5% for the year ended December 31, 2023, primarily as a result of the strategic expansion of our Citizens take-out program and increased rates which increased our gross written premiums by a greater amount than the offsetting increase in reinsurance costs.

Loss ratio, expressed as a percentage, is the ratio of losses and LAE to net premiums earned plus policy fees. We add policy fees to net premiums earned when calculating our loss and expense ratios to include the total revenue

 

65

produced by a policy, given they are earned when a policy is written. Our loss ratio increased by 160 basis points (bps) in 2024, reaching to 47.9%, compared to 46.3% in 2023. The increase was primarily due to the losses retained on hurricanes Milton, Helene, and Debby, partially offset by reduced litigation expenses following Florida’s legislative reforms, resulting in decreased claims frequency, losses and loss adjustment expenses.

Expense ratio, expressed as a percentage, is the ratio of policy acquisition expenses and general and administrative expenses to net premiums earned plus policy fees. Our expense ratio improved by 400 basis points (bps), 33.0% for the year ended December 31, 2024 compared to 37.0%, for the year ended December 31, 2023 primarily due to increased non-catastrophe ceded commissions.

Combined ratio is the sum of the loss ratio and the expense ratio. We utilize combined ratio to assess our underwriting performance. A combined ratio below 100% indicates an underwriting profit, while a combined ratio exceeding 100% indicates an underwriting loss. Overall, our combined ratio improved to 80.9% in 2024 from 83.3% for the year ended December 31, 2023 reinforcing our commitment to disciplined underwriting and sustainable profitability.

Return on equity is defined as net income divided by the average beginning and ending members’ equity during the applicable period. Our return on equity decreased to 26.8% for the year ended December 31, 2024 from 32.9% for the year ended December 31, 2023. The decrease in our return on equity ratio is due primarily to an increase in members’ equity due to retained earnings.

Key Business Metrics and Non-GAAP Financial Measures

We utilize these non-GAAP financial measures to analyze our business and provide useful information about our financial performance. The non-GAAP financial measures are not recognized terms under GAAP and should not be considered as alternatives to the corresponding GAAP measures of financial performance, or any other performance measure derived in accordance with GAAP. Because not all companies use identical calculations, the presentation of the non-GAAP financial measures may not be comparable to other similarly titled measures of other companies and can differ significantly from company to company. Our management uses these non-GAAP financial measures, in conjunction with GAAP financial measures, as an integral part of managing our business and to, among other things: (i) monitor and evaluate the performance of our business operations and financial performance; (ii) facilitate internal comparisons of the historical operating performance of our business operations; (iii) facilitate external comparisons of the results of our overall business to the historical operating performance of other companies that may have different capital structures and debt levels and different go-to-market models; (iv) review and assess the operating performance of our management team; (v) analyze and evaluate financial and strategic planning decisions regarding future operating investments; and (vi) plan for and prepare future annual operating budgets and determine appropriate levels of operating investments.

We monitor the following key business metrics and non-GAAP financial measures that assist us in evaluating our business, measuring our performance, identifying trends and making strategic decisions. As such, we have presented the following non-GAAP measure, their most directly comparable GAAP measure, and key business metrics:

 

Non-GAAP Measure		Comparable GAAP Measure
Underwriting income (loss)		Income before taxes
Adjusted net income		Net income
Adjusted return on equity		Return on equity
Underlying loss and loss adjustment expense ratio		Losses and loss adjustment expense ratio
Ceded catastrophe excess of loss premiums ratio		Ceded premiums earned to gross premiums earned

Underwriting income (loss)

Underwriting income (loss) is a non-GAAP financial measure defined as income (loss) before income taxes, excluding net investment income, net realized gains and losses on investments, interest expense, other income and,

 

66

following the consummation of this offering, will exclude expenses related stock-based compensation. We use underwriting income as an internal performance measure in the management of our operations because we believe it gives us and users of our financial information useful insight into our results of operations and our underlying business performance and provides insight into the results of how effective our policy underwriting is. Underwriting income (loss) should not be viewed as a substitute for net income calculated in accordance with GAAP, and other companies may define underwriting income differently.

Underwriting income (loss) increased $4.9 million, or 15.8%, to $36.1 million for the year ended December 31, 2024 from $31.2 million for the year ended December 31, 2023, primarily as a result of the strategic expansion of our Citizens take-out program and increased rate adjustments.

Underwriting income for the years ended December 31, 2024 and 2023 reconciles to net income as follows:

 

		Year ended December 31,
($ in thousands)		2024				2023
Income before taxes		$	51,039			$	44,755
Less:
Net investment income			14,180				12,653
Net realized losses on investments			119				(22	)
Other income			607				923
Underwriting income		$	36,133			$	31,201

Adjusted net income (loss)

Adjusted net income (loss) is a non-GAAP financial measure defined as net income excluding net realized gains or losses on investments, and following the consummation of this offering, will include expenses related to stock-based compensation, net of tax impact. We use adjusted net income as an internal performance measure in the management of our operations because we believe it gives us and users of our financial information useful insight into our results of operations and our underlying business performance excluding the impact of realized gains and losses on the sale of securities which we do not view as core to the underlying trends in our business. Adjusted net income should not be viewed as a substitute for net income calculated in accordance with GAAP, and other companies may define adjusted net income differently.

Adjusted net income (loss) increased $1.9 million, or 4.9%, to $39.6 million for the year ended December 31, 2024 from $37.8 million for the year ended December 31, 2023, primarily as a result of the strategic expansion of our Citizens take-out program and increased rate adjustments.

Adjusted net income (loss) for the years ended December 31, 2024 and 2023 reconciles to net income as follows:

 

		2024								2023
($ in thousands)		Pre-tax				After tax				Pre-tax				After tax
Net income		$	51,039			$	39,742			$	44,755			$	37,797
Less:
Net realized investment income			119				94				(22	)			(17	)
Adjusted net income (loss)		$	50,920			$	39,648			$	44,777			$	37,814

Adjusted return on equity

Adjusted return on equity is a non-GAAP financial measure defined as adjusted net income divided by the average of beginning and ending members’ equity during the applicable period. We use adjusted return on equity as an internal performance measure in the management of our operations because we believe it gives us and users

 

67

of our financial information useful insight into our underlying business performance. Adjusted return on equity should not be viewed as a substitute for any metrics calculated in accordance with GAAP, and other companies may define adjusted return on equity differently.

Adjusted return on equity decreased 6.1%, to 26.8% for the year ended December 31, 2024 from 32.9% for the year ended December 31, 2023, primarily as a result of net income holding stable and increased members’ equity due to growth in retained earnings.

Adjusted return on equity for the years ended December 31, 2024 and 2023 reconciles to return on equity as follows:

 

		Year ended December 31,
($ in thousands)		2024				2023
Numerator: Net income (loss)		$	39,742			$	37,797
Denominator: Average beginning and ending members’ equity			148,180				114,877
Return on equity			26.8	%			32.9	%
Numerator: adjusted net income (loss) (after tax)			39,648				37,814
Denominator: Average members’ equity			148,180				114,877
Adjusted return on equity			26.8	%			32.9	%

Underlying loss and loss adjustment expense ratio

Underlying loss and loss adjustment expense ratio is a non-GAAP measure. We calculate the underlying loss and loss adjustment expense ratio by subtracting current year net catastrophe losses and prior year net reserve development from total net losses and LAE and dividing that amount by the sum of total net premiums earned plus policy fees. We use the underlying loss and LAE ratio to analyze our loss trends before the impact of catastrophe losses and prior year reserve development. These two items can have a significant impact on our loss trends in a given period. We believe it is useful for investors to evaluate these components both separately and in the aggregate when reviewing our performance. The most directly comparable GAAP measure is net loss and LAE ratio. The underlying loss and LAE ratio should not be considered a substitute for net loss and LAE ratio and does not reflect the overall profitability of our business.

We experienced favorable net prior year reserve development of $3.2 million for the year ended December 31, 2024 and $2.6 million for the year ended December 31, 2023 primarily driven by the improving non-catastrophe loss environment. We experienced higher net catastrophe losses of $32.2 million for the year ended December 31, 2024 up from $21.8 million for the year ended December 31, 2023 driven largely by Hurricanes Milton and Helene that made landfall in 2024.

The underlying loss and loss adjustment expense ratio decreased to 32.6% for the year ended December 31, 2024 from 36.1% for the year ended December 31, 2023 primarily due to improvements in the non-catastrophe loss environment and lower claims litigation trends.

 

68

The following table summarizes loss ratios and underlying loss and LAE ratios for the years ended December 31, 2024 and 2023:

 

		For the Year Ended December 31,
($ in thousands)		2024				2023
Total Net Premiums Earned		$	182,055			$	180,262
Plus: Policy Fees			7,393				7,055
Total Net Premiums Earned Plus Policy Fees			189,448				187,317
Net
Losses and Loss Adjustment Expenses, Net			90,832				86,749
Loss and Loss Adjustment Expense Ratio (% Net Premiums Earned Plus Policy Fees)			47.9	%			46.3	%
Less:
Current Year Net Catastrophe Losses			32,192				21,753
Prior Year Net Reserve Development			(3,187	)			(2,595	)
Underlying Loss and Loss Adjustment Expenses, Net			61,827				67,591
Underlying Loss and Loss Adjustment Expense Ratio (% Net Premiums Earned Plus Policy Fees)			32.6	%			36.1	%

Ceded catastrophe excess of loss premiums ratio

Ceded catastrophe excess of loss premiums ratio is a non-GAAP measure and, expressed as percentage, is defined as ceded catastrophe excess of loss premiums earned divided by gross premiums earned. We believe it is useful for investors to evaluate ceded catastrophe excess of loss premiums ratio as it provides a proxy for our cost of catastrophe reinsurance. The most directly comparable GAAP measure is the ratio of ceded premiums earned to gross premiums earned. The ceded catastrophe excess of loss premiums ratio measure should not be considered a substitute for ceded premiums earned and does not reflect the overall profitability of our business.

Ceded catastrophe excess of loss premiums ratio increased 3.7% to 44.9% for the year ended December 31, 2024 from 41.2% for the year ended December 31, 2023, primarily as a result of the increase in reinsurance costs with the strategic expansion from the Citizen’s take-out.

The calculation of our ceded excess of loss premiums ratio is shown in the table below:

 

		For Year Ended December 31,
($ in thousands)		2024				2023
Gross Premiums Earned		$	682,216			$	590,515
Total Ceded Premiums Earned			(500,161	)			(410,253	)
Less: NCQSR and other ancillary reinsurance treaties			(194,022	)			(167,230	)
Ceded Catastrophe Excess of Loss Premiums Earned			(306,139	)			(243,023	)
Ceded Catastrophe Excess of Loss Premiums Ratio			44.9	%			41.2	%

Liquidity and Capital Resources

Liquidity is a measure of a company’s ability to generate cash flows sufficient to meet the short-term and long-term cash requirements of its business operations. Funds generated from operations have been sufficient to meet our current and long-term liquidity requirements.

 

69